|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|14-153||4th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2014|
Issue: Whether Virginia violates the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses by denying the right of marriage to same-sex couples and by refusing to recognize same-sex marriages lawfully performed outside of Virginia.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Aug 8 2014||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 11, 2014)|
|Aug 22 2014||Brief of the Harris Class Respondents in opposition filed.|
|Aug 25 2014||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioner.|
|Aug 27 2014||Response to petition from respondents Timothy B. Bostic, Tony C. London, Carol Schall, and Mary Townley filed.|
|Aug 27 2014||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs,in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the Bostic Respondents.|
|Aug 27 2014||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or neither party, received from counsel for respondent George E. Schaefer, III.|
|Sep 3 2014||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or neither party, received from counsel for Harris Class Respondents.|
|Sep 3 2014||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or neither party, received from counsel for respondent Michele B. McQuigg. VIDED|
|Sep 3 2014||Letter of respondent Michele B. McQuigg received and filed.|
|Sep 4 2014||Brief amici curiae of Thirty Companies Representing Employers filed. VIDED.|
|Sep 4 2014||Brief amici curiae of Colage, et al. filed. VIDED.|
|Sep 4 2014||Brief amici curiae of Massachusetts, et al. filed. VIDED.|
|Sep 5 2014||Letter of respondent George E. Schaefer, III received and filed. VIDED|
|Sep 10 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 29, 2014.|
|Sep 11 2014||Brief amici curiae of The National Coalition of Black Pastors, et al. filed. VIDED. (Distributed)|
|Oct 6 2014||Petition DENIED.|
The clerk of the court just notified counsel in a juvenile sentencing case—that was sent back to a lower court this week in light of the court's decision in Jones v. Mississippi—that Justice Kagan unwittingly failed to recuse herself after participating in part of the case as SG.
It’s a quiet week, so now is a great time to listen to Judge John Owens regale @AHoweBlogger with the tale of Ashton Embry and the greatest leak in Supreme Court history.
Come for the high drama, stay for the good humor and an RBG story or two.
The biggest leak in Supreme Court history - SCOTUSblog
In a city full of anonymous sources, the Supreme Court is famously leak-proof. But a century ago, the court had ...
The US Supreme Court should overturn the Facebook’s “Oversight Board’s” “ruling” which upholds the outlawing of the 45th President of the United States from social media.
This is a big tech, corporate oligarchy without standing and it’s gone too far. Enough is enough.
The Supreme Court will hear its last case of the term today at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Here’s a summary of Terry v. United States in a TikTok minute.
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will tackle the legacy of the Reagan-era War on Drugs and Congress' attempt to reduce the punishment disparity between crack-cocaine and powder cocaine offenses.
As @ekownyankah notes, this case has a little bit of everything.
In final case the court will hear this term, profound issues of race, incarceration and the war on drugs - SCOTUSblog
Academics naturally believe that even obscure cases in their field are underappreciated; each minor tax or bankruptcy ...
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket filing in which a church argues that state COVID-related restrictions lack sufficient carveouts for religious worship. This one challenges Colorado's restrictions. It relies heavily on last month's ruling in Tandon v. Newsom.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.