Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
13-640 | 2d Cir. | Not Argued | Sep 29, 2014 | TBD | TBD | OT 2014 |
Holding: Dismissed as improvidently granted.
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
Sep 13 2013 | Application (13A270) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 25, 2013 to November 22, 2013, submitted to Justice Ginsburg. |
Sep 17 2013 | Application (13A270) granted by Justice Ginsburg extending the time to file until November 22, 2013. |
Nov 22 2013 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 26, 2013) |
Dec 13 2013 | Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioner. |
Dec 16 2013 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including January 27, 2014. |
Dec 18 2013 | Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondent General Retirement System of the City of Detroit. |
Dec 20 2013 | Waiver of right of respondent IndyMac MBS, Inc. to respond filed. |
Dec 26 2013 | Brief amici curiae of Public Pension Funds |
Dec 26 2013 | Brief amici curiae of Civil Procedure and Securities Law Professors filed. |
Dec 26 2013 | Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Shareholder and Consumer Attorneys filed. |
Jan 27 2014 | Brief of respondents Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, et al. in opposition filed. |
Feb 12 2014 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 28, 2014. |
Feb 12 2014 | Reply of petitioner Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi filed. (Distributed) |
Mar 3 2014 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 7, 2014. |
Mar 10 2014 | Petition GRANTED. |
Apr 7 2014 | The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including May 21, 2014. |
Apr 7 2014 | The time to file respondents' briefs on the merits is extended to and including July 17, 2014. |
May 13 2014 | Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party, or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioner. |
May 13 2014 | Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for respondent Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Association. |
May 13 2014 | Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondent General Retirement System of the City of Detroit. |
May 15 2014 | Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondent IndyMac MBS Inc. |
May 20 2014 | Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondents Credit Suisse Securities, Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc., Goldman Sachs & Co., and Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC. |
May 21 2014 | Brief of petitioner Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi filed. |
May 21 2014 | Joint appendix filed. 2 Volumes (statement of costs filed) |
May 21 2014 | Brief of respondents Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Association (LACERA) and General Retirement System of the City of Detroit in support of petitioner filed. |
May 28 2014 | Brief amici curiae of Public and Private Pension Funds filed. |
May 28 2014 | Brief amici curiae of Civil Procedure and Securities Law Professors filed. |
May 28 2014 | Brief amici curiae of Retired Federal Judges filed. |
May 28 2014 | Brief amicus curiae of W.R. Huff Asset Management Co., L.L.C. filed. |
May 28 2014 | Brief amicus curiae of AARP filed. |
May 28 2014 | Brief amicus curiae of American Association for Justice filed. |
May 28 2014 | Brief amicus curiae of Public Citizen, Inc. filed. |
Jul 9 2014 | Record requested from U.S.C.A. 2nd Circuit. |
Jul 10 2014 | Record received from U.S.C.A. 2nd Circuit. The record is electronic. |
Jul 15 2014 | Letter from counsel for respondent IndyMac MBS, Inc. notifying the Court that IndyMac MBS, Inc. will not file a brief on the merits in this case. |
Jul 17 2014 | Brief of respondents Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, et al. filed. |
Jul 18 2014 | SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Monday, October 6, 2014 |
Jul 24 2014 | Brief amicus curiae of Business Roundtable filed. |
Jul 24 2014 | Brief amicus curiae of Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association filed. |
Aug 7 2014 | CIRCULATED. |
Aug 18 2014 | Reply of petitioner Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi filed. (Distributed) |
Sep 23 2014 | The parties are directed to file letter briefs addressing the following question: What should be the effect, if any, of the proposed settlement agreement now pending before the district court on the matter pending before this Court? The briefs, limited to 10 pages, are to be filed simultaneously with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before noon, Thursday, September 25, 2014. |
Sep 24 2014 | Letter brief of respondents Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
Sep 25 2014 | Letter brief of petitioner Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi filed. (Distributed) |
Sep 25 2014 | Letter from counsel for respondent IndyMac MBS, Inc. in support of letter of respondent Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, et al. (Distributed) |
Sep 29 2014 | Writ of certiorari DISMISSED as improvidently granted. |
Oct 31 2014 | JUDGMENT ISSUED. |
We're so excited about our April 15 Live Webinar (w/ @HarvardACS & @HarvardFedSoc), Covering the Court, featuring an all-star lineup of panelists @jduffyrice, @katieleebarlow, @whignewtons, & @stevenmazie! _👩⚖️👩⚖️👩⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️_ Register here ➡️ https://harvard.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_k_b_9IPBQ_GV37rpsjF9kw
Senator Markey (D-Ma) is delivering remarks right now in front of the Supreme Court introducing the Judiciary Act of 2021 to expand the court to 13 justices. He’s flanked by Chairman of House Judiciary, Jerry Nadler (D-NY), and Hank Johnson (D-Ga).
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here:
Cast your vote below!
The “great chief” and the “super chief”: A final showdown in Supreme Court March Madness - SCOTUSblog
Forget Ali vs. Frazier, Celtics vs. Lakers, or Evert vs. Navratilova. It’s time for Marshall vs. Warren. After...
www.scotusblog.com
In yet another Friday night shadow docket order, a divided Supreme Court sides with challengers to California’s COVID-related restrictions. Brief per curiam opinion and dissent from Justice Kagan: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20a151_4g15.pdf
By vote of 5-4, #SCOTUS blocks California's COVID-related restrictions on in-home prayer meetings and worship. Opinion & Kagan's dissent are here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20a151_4g15.pdf
President Biden will sign an executive order authorizing a commission to study Supreme Court reform. The commission will review “the length of service and turnover of justices on the court; the membership and size of the court” among other topics.
President Biden to Sign Executive Order Creating the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States | The White House
President Biden will today issue an executive order forming the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States, comprised of a
www.whitehouse.gov
The Supreme Court will hear April and May oral arguments remotely but with a live audio feed.
#SCOTUS confirms that "[i]n keeping with public health guidance in response to COVID-19," it will hear oral arguments in April and on May 4 remotely, as it has for the other argument sessions this term. Press release here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Media-Advisory-Teleconference-Arguments.pdf
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.