|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|18-1516||7th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2019|
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Apr 26 2019||Application (18A1114) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 14, 2019 to June 4, 2019, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.|
|Apr 29 2019||Application (18A1114) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until June 4, 2019.|
|Jun 04 2019||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 8, 2019)|
|Jun 11 2019||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioners, Veronica Price, et al.|
|Jun 28 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 8, 2019 to August 7, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jul 02 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 7, 2019.|
|Jul 08 2019||Brief amicus curiae of American Center for Law and Justice filed.|
|Jul 08 2019||Brief amici curiae of 40 Days for Life & Sidewalk Advocates for Life filed.|
|Jul 08 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Alliance Defending Freedom filed.|
|Jul 08 2019||Brief amici curiae of American Civil Rights Union, et al. filed.|
|Jul 08 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence filed.|
|Jul 08 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Justice and Freedom Fund filed.|
|Jul 08 2019||Brief amici curiae of American Family Association and Dr. Alveda King filed.|
|Jul 08 2019||Brief amici curiae of Conservative Legal Defense and Education Fund, et al. filed.|
|Aug 07 2019||Brief of respondents City of Chicago, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Aug 21 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.|
|Aug 21 2019||Reply of petitioners Veronica Price, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jun 29 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 7/1/2020.|
|Jul 02 2020||Petition DENIED. Justice Thomas would grant the petition for a writ of certiorari.|
NEW: The Supreme Court rules against the FTC in a dispute with a payday loan company over the extent of the FTC's authority to seek monetary restitution from companies engaged in deceptive practices. SCOTUS says 9-0 that FTC doesn't have that authority under the statute at issue.
NEW: The Supreme Court sides against the federal government and in favor of people who brought Social Security claims in a technical ruling about "exhaustion" rules (essentially, when in the bureaucratic process the claimants were required to raise certain legal arguments).
BREAKING: In 6-3 decision, SCOTUS declines to further limit the ability of states to sentence juveniles to life without parole. The court upholds the sentence of a Mississippi man who killed his grandfather when he was 15; says sentencing procedure did not violate 8th Amendment.
Supreme Court opinions in 15 minutes!
We’re LIVE right now discussing which opinions we could see today and answering your questions. Join us!
Announcement of opinions for Thursday, April 22 - SCOTUSblog
We will be live blogging on Thursday, April 22, as the court releases one or more opinions in argued cases. Th...
Today at the court:
A nuts-and-bolts question of civil procedure. After an appeal is decided, do courts have discretion to limit the administrative “costs” that the prevailing party can recover from the losing party?
Argument begins at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Justices to consider awards of costs of appellate litigation - SCOTUSblog
Wednesday’s argument in City of San Antonio v. Hotels.com brings the justices a basic nuts-and-bolts question of...
In 2019, the Supreme Court limited the scope of a federal law that bans people convicted of felonies from having a gun. Up this morning at the court: back-to-back cases that will decide how many felon-in-possession convictions will need new trials or pleas under that 2019 ruling.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.