|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|18-1516||7th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2019|
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Apr 26 2019||Application (18A1114) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 14, 2019 to June 4, 2019, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.|
|Apr 29 2019||Application (18A1114) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until June 4, 2019.|
|Jun 04 2019||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 8, 2019)|
|Jun 11 2019||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioners, Veronica Price, et al.|
|Jun 28 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 8, 2019 to August 7, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jul 02 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 7, 2019.|
|Jul 08 2019||Brief amicus curiae of American Center for Law and Justice filed.|
|Jul 08 2019||Brief amici curiae of 40 Days for Life & Sidewalk Advocates for Life filed.|
|Jul 08 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Alliance Defending Freedom filed.|
|Jul 08 2019||Brief amici curiae of American Civil Rights Union, et al. filed.|
|Jul 08 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence filed.|
|Jul 08 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Justice and Freedom Fund filed.|
|Jul 08 2019||Brief amici curiae of American Family Association and Dr. Alveda King filed.|
|Jul 08 2019||Brief amici curiae of Conservative Legal Defense and Education Fund, et al. filed.|
|Aug 07 2019||Brief of respondents City of Chicago, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Aug 21 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.|
|Aug 21 2019||Reply of petitioners Veronica Price, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jun 29 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 7/1/2020.|
|Jul 02 2020||Petition DENIED. Justice Thomas would grant the petition for a writ of certiorari.|
Having covered the Supreme Court for six decades, @lylden has seen a lot of changes at 1 First Street. In the latest piece in our series on the post-COVID court, Lyle examines how the court's pandemic operations could spur permanent reform.
How has COVID-19 changed the Supreme Court? And are any of those changes worth keeping? Today we launch a symposium examining those questions.
First up, a piece from @stevenmazie on how to reform oral arguments after the pandemic.
The court after COVID: A recipe for oral argument reform - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court has not yet announced whether it will return to normal operations when the 2021-22 term begins ...
NEW shadow-docket case: New York landlords ask SCOTUS for an emergency order to prevent the state from continuing to enforce its COVID-related eviction moratorium. They say the moratorium "runs roughshod" over their constitutional rights.
Filing here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A8-1.pdf
New on the shadow docket: Florida seeks an emergency order blocking CDC policies that substantially limit cruise ships from sailing.
Florida asks #SCOTUS to block, pending appeal, CDC restrictions imposed on cruise industry b/c of COVID-19 pandemic: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A5.pdf
NEW: Mississippi formally asks the Supreme Court to overturn its landmark abortion case, Roe v. Wade, in latest court filing. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1392/184703/20210722161332385_19-1392BriefForPetitioners.pdf
Biden’s SCOTUS reform commission met yesterday and discussed several reform ideas including adding justices and adopting a formal code of ethics.
Term limits emerged as a popular idea. But how to implement it — via statute or constitutional amendment?
Term limits emerge as popular proposal at latest meeting of court-reform commission - SCOTUSblog
The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court reconvened on Tuesday to hear from a new set of experts on vari...
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.