|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|13-1041||D.C. Cir.||Dec 1, 2014||Mar 9, 2015||9-0||Sotomayor||OT 2014|
Holding: The D.C. Circuit’s Paralyzed Veterans doctrine, which requires agencies to use the notice-and-comment process before it can significantly revise an interpretive rule, is contrary to the clear text of the Administrative Procedure Act’s rulemaking provisions and improperly imposes on agencies an obligation beyond the Act’s maximum procedural requirements.
Judgment: Reversed, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Sotomayor on March 9, 2015. Justice Alito joined except for Part III–B, and filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. Justice Scalia and Justice Thomas filed opinions concurring in the judgment.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Dec 18 2013||Application (13A636) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 31, 2013 to January 30, 2014, submitted to The Chief Justice.|
|Dec 19 2013||Application (13A636) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until January 30, 2014.|
|Jan 17 2014||Application (13A636) to extend further the time from January 30, 2014 to February 28, 2014, submitted to The Chief Justice.|
|Jan 21 2014||Application (13A636) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until February 28, 2014.|
|Feb 18 2014||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for respondent. VIDED.|
|Feb 28 2014||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 2, 2014)|
|Mar 24 2014||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including May 2, 2014.|
|Mar 26 2014||Brief amici curiae of Administrative Law Scholars filed. VIDED.|
|May 2 2014||Brief of respondent Mortgage Bankers Association in opposition filed. VIDED.|
|May 20 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 5, 2014.|
|May 21 2014||Reply of petitioner Thomas E. Perez, Secretary of Labor filed. (Distributed)|
|Jun 9 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 12, 2014.|
|Jun 16 2014||Petition GRANTED The petition for a writ of certiorari in No. 13-1052 is granted. The cases are consolidated and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument.|
|Jun 26 2014||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner Thomas E. Perez, Secretary of Labor.|
|Jul 7 2014||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioners' briefs on the merits is extended to and including August 13, 2014. VIDED|
|Jul 7 2014||The time to file respondents' brief(s) on the merits is extended to and including September 25, 2014. VIDED|
|Jul 21 2014||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner GRANTED.|
|Aug 11 2014||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's briefs on the merits is further extended to and including August 20, 2014. VIDED|
|Aug 11 2014||The time to file respondents' brief(s) on the merits is further extended to and including October 9, 2014. VIDED|
|Aug 20 2014||Brief of petitioners Thomas E. Perez, Secretary of Labor, et al. filed. VIDED.|
|Aug 20 2014||Brief of petitioners in No. 13-1052, Jerome Nickols, et al. filed.|
|Sep 4 2014||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, December 1, 2014. VIDED|
|Sep 9 2014||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs in support of either party or of neither party from counsel for the respondents. VIDED|
|Sep 22 2014||Record requested from U.S.C.A. Dist. of Columbia Circuit.|
|Sep 26 2014||Record received from U.S.D.C. Dist. of Columbia Circuit. The record is electronic and located on PACER.|
|Oct 9 2014||Brief of respondents Mortgage Bankers Association, et al. filed. VIDED.|
|Oct 16 2014||Brief amicus curiae of National Mining Association filed. VIDED.|
|Oct 16 2014||Brief amici curiae of National Federation of Independent Business, et al. filed. VIDED.|
|Oct 16 2014||Brief amici curiae of Washington Legal Foundation and Allied Educational Foundation filed. VIDED.|
|Oct 16 2014||Brief amici curiae of Cato Institute, et al. filed. VIDED.|
|Oct 16 2014||Brief amici curiae of American Hospital Association, et al. filed. VIDED.|
|Oct 16 2014||Brief amici curiae of Utility Air Regulatory Group and American Forest & Paper Association filed. VIDED.|
|Oct 16 2014||Brief amicus curiae of Quicken Loans Inc. filed. VIDED.|
|Oct 16 2014||Brief amicus curiae of Thomas Jefferson Institute for Public Policy filed. VIDED.|
|Oct 16 2014||Brief amicus curiae of Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence filed. VIDED.|
|Oct 16 2014||Motion for divided argument filed by petitioners Jerome Nickols, et al. VIDED.|
|Oct 16 2014||Brief amici curiae of State and Local Government Associations filed. VIDED. (Distributed)|
|Oct 16 2014||Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed. VIDED.|
|Oct 27 2014||CIRCULATED.|
|Oct 28 2014||Opposition of petitioners Perez, et al. to motion of Nickols, et al. for divided argument filed. VIDED|
|Nov 10 2014||Motion for divided argument filed by petitioners Jerome Nickols, et al. DENIED.|
|Nov 10 2014||Reply of petitioners Thomas E. Perez, Secretary of Labor filed. VIDED. (Distributed)|
|Nov 10 2014||Reply of petitioners in No. 13-1052, Jerome Nickols, et al., filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 1 2014||Argued. For petitioners: Edwin S. Kneedler, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Allyson N. Ho, Dallas, Tex.|
|Mar 9 2015||Judgment REVERSED. Sotomayor, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, and Kagan, JJ., joined, and in which Alito, J., joined except for Part III-B. Alito, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. Scalia, J., and Thomas, J., filed opinions concurring in the judgment. VIDED|
|Apr 10 2015||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
Bill Cosby’s prosecutors asked the Supreme Court to reinstate his conviction today. Quick explainer.
In our latest episode of SCOTUStalk, @shefalil of @19thnews joined us to preview Wednesday's argument in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health. Shefali explains the current state of abortion access and the case's implications in Mississippi and across America.
Roe, Dobbs, and the current state of abortion access - SCOTUSblog
In advance of Wednesday's oral argument in the momentous abortion case, Shefali Luthra, a gender and health care r...
Update: Without calling for a response or referring the case to the full court, Justice Breyer just rejected last week's challenge from Massachusetts hospital workers who object to the hospital's COVID vaccine mandate.
(Breyer handles emergency requests from Massachusetts.)
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket challenge to a COVID vaccine mandate. This one is from employees at Mass General Brigham who say the Boston-based hospital violated federal law by not granting them exemptions from the hospital's vaccine policy. Filing here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/21A175.pdf
Today at SCOTUS: The justices return to the bench for oral argument in a case about Medicare payments to hospitals that serve low-income patients. Lots of money at stake, plus potential implications for the Chevron doctrine. @JACoganJr explains the case:
Money for safety-net hospitals at stake in dispute over Medicare payment formula - SCOTUSblog
When it comes to highlighting the complexity of the Medicare Act and its hospital payment rules, Becerra v. Empire...
Two days from now, SCOTUS will hear the biggest abortion case in a generation. In a battle over a Mississippi law, abortion opponents are asking the court to end the constitutional right to abortion. Here's our preview of the case, via @AHoweBlogger.
Roe v. Wade hangs in balance as reshaped court prepares to hear biggest abortion case in decades - SCOTUSblog
When he ran for president in 2016, then-candidate Donald Trump promised to nominate Supreme Court justices who would...
JUST IN: One new cert grant this morning: Berger v. North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP. More on the case here: https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/berger-v-north-carolina-state-conference-of-the-naacp/
#SCOTUS adds one new case to its merits docket this morning: Berger v. NC Conference of NAACP, in which the justices will weigh in on an effort by Republican legislators in the state to intervene to defend the state’s voter-ID law. Here's the order: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/112421zr_7li8.pdf