Linked with:
| Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15-1167 | 9th Cir. | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | OT 16 |
Issue: (1) Whether, in determining an appropriate remedy for a violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act under the “Rule of Reason,” a court may treat the restraint itself – here, the agreement among the NCAA and its members prohibiting college athlete compensation, or what the NCAA calls “amateurism” – as a legitimate procompetitive effect: and (2) whether, after finding a violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act under the Rule of Reason, a court is restricted to awarding relief that the plaintiff proves is “virtually as effective” as the restraint in serving its alleged purposes, “without significantly increased cost.”
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| Mar 14 2016 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 18, 2016) |
| Apr 13 2016 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including May 18, 2016. |
| May 13 2016 | Brief of respondent National Collegiate Athletic Association in opposition filed. |
| May 26 2016 | Reply of petitioner Edward C. O'Bannon, Jr., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated filed. (Distributed) |
| May 31 2016 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 16, 2016. |
| Jun 6 2016 | Rescheduled. |
| Jul 20 2016 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 26, 2016. |
| Oct 3 2016 | Petition DENIED. |
