Nordlicht v. United States
Petition for certiorari denied on October 3, 2022
Issue: Whether district courts have discretion to weigh
the evidence, including the credibility of witnesses,
when deciding to grant a new trial under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33, or
whether they must defer to the jury’s view of the
evidence unless the evidence is patently incredible,
defies physical realities, or is similarly flawed.
| Date | Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding) |
|---|
| Mar 29 2022 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 4, 2022) |
| Apr 28 2022 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 4, 2022 to June 3, 2022, submitted to The Clerk. |
| Apr 29 2022 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 3, 2022. |
| May 04 2022 | Brief amicus curiae of Professor Jennifer L. Mascott filed. |
| May 26 2022 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 3, 2022 to July 6, 2022, submitted to The Clerk. |
| May 27 2022 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 6, 2022. |
| Jul 01 2022 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 6, 2022 to July 27, 2022, submitted to The Clerk. |
| Jul 05 2022 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including July 27, 2022. |
| Jul 27 2022 | Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed. |
| Aug 10 2022 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022. |
| Aug 10 2022 | Reply of petitioners Mark Nordlicht, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
| Oct 03 2022 | Petition DENIED. |
