Issue: (1) Whether the Court will grant Nebraska and Oklahoma leave to file an original action to seek a declaratory judgment stating that Sections 16(4) and (5) of Article XVIII of the Colorado Constitution are preempted by federal law, and therefore unconstitutional and unenforceable under the Supremacy Clause, Article VI of the U.S. Constitution; (2) whether Colorado should be enjoined from any and all application and implementation of Sections 16(4) and (5) of Article XVIII of the Colorado Constitution; (3) whether Colorado should be enjoined from any and all application and implementation of statutes or regulations promulgated pursuant to Sections 16(4) and (5) of Article XVIII of the Colorado Constitution; and (4) whether Colorado should be ordered to pay the plaintiff states’ costs and expenses associated with this legal action, including attorneys’ fees. CVSG: 12/18/2015.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Dec 18 2014||Motion for leave to file a bill of complaint filed.|
|Feb 10 2015||Order extending time to file response to the bill of complaint to and including March 27, 2015|
|Feb 19 2015||Brief amici curiae of All Nine Former Administrators of Drug Enforcement filed.|
|Mar 27 2015||Brief amicus curiae of Washington and Oregon filed.|
|Mar 27 2015||Brief of respondent Colorado in opposition filed.|
|Apr 03 2015||Reply of plaintiffs Nebraska and Oklahoma filed.|
|Apr 15 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 1, 2015.|
|May 04 2015||The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.|
|Dec 16 2015||Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.|
|Jan 05 2016||Supplemental brief of petitioners Nebraska and Oklahoma filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 06 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 22, 2016.|
|Feb 08 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 19, 2016.|
|Feb 29 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 4, 2016.|
|Mar 14 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 18, 2016.|
|Mar 21 2016||Motion for leave to file a bill of complaint DENIED. Justice Thomas with whom Justice Alito joins, dissenting from the denial of motion for leave to file complaint. (Detached Opinion)|
NEW: The Justice Department, as expected, says it plans to ask the Supreme Court to block enforcement of the Texas law that bans abortions after six weeks of pregnancy.
NEW: Biden's commission studying proposals for Supreme Court reform has released 200+ pages of "discussion materials" in advance of its final report, slated to be issued next month. The materials are divided into five categories and are available here: https://www.whitehouse.gov/pcscotus/public-meetings/october-15-2021-pcscotus-meeting/
Curious: This morning the Supreme Court website had a dropdown menu option called “financial disclosure reports” (although nothing to see when you click on it). Now it’s gone
Today at SCOTUS: The Biden administration will appear before the justices asking to reinstate the death penalty for Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev -- despite Biden's campaign pledge to end the death penalty and the DOJ's recent moratorium on federal executions.
Brett Kavanaugh was back on the bench today after participating in last week's arguments remotely due to his positive COVID test. Here's the full nine-person bench, in a sketch by @Courtartist.
#SCOTUS calls for the views of the US Solicitor General in Epic Systems v. Tata Consultancy Services, re whether a punitive damages award that complies with a state law that caps punitive damages passes constitutional muster