|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|15-1388||9th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 16|
Issue: (1) Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in holding that NCAA rules defining “the eligibility of participants” in NCAA-sponsored athletic contests, NCAA v. Board of Regents of Univ. of Okla., violated the Sherman Act; and (2) whether the First Amendment protects a speaker against a state-law right-of-publicity claim based on the realistic portrayal of a person in an expressive work (here, a student-athlete in a college-sports videogame).
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Mar 2 2016||Application (15A913) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from March 15, 2016 to April 14, 2016, submitted to Justice Kennedy.|
|Mar 7 2016||Application (15A913) granted by Justice Kennedy extending the time to file until April 14, 2016.|
|Apr 1 2016||Application (15A913) to extend further the time from April 14, 2016 to May 13, 2016, submitted to Justice Kennedy.|
|Apr 4 2016||Application (15A913) granted by Justice Kennedy extending the time to file until May 13, 2016.|
|May 13 2016||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 15, 2016)|
|Jun 6 2016||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including July 15, 2016.|
|Jun 13 2016||Brief amici curiae of 28 Constitutional Law and Intellectual Property Law Professors filed.|
|Jun 14 2016||Brief amicus curiae of Bar Association of the District of Columbia Antitrust Law Section filed.|
|Jun 15 2016||Brief amici curiae of Antitrust Scholars filed.|
|Jun 15 2016||Brief amicus curiae of National Federation of State High School Associations filed.|
|Jul 1 2016||Brief of respondents Edward C. O'Bannon, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Jul 19 2016||Reply of petitioner National Collegiate Athletic Association filed.|
|Jul 20 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 26, 2016.|
|Oct 3 2016||Petition DENIED.|
No more SCOTUS opinions for today. There are 18 cases still outstanding from the current term, including disputes over Obamacare, religious rights and voting rights. The next opinion day that we know of is Thursday.
SCOTUS rules 9-0 that people convicted of certain low-level crack-cocaine offenses are not eligible for re-sentencing under the First Step Act, a 2018 law that made some criminal-justice reforms retroactive. Here is the opinion in Terry v. United States. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20-5904_i4dk.pdf
SCOTUS sides with the gov in 2 cases about whether certain criminal defendants are entitled to new trials / new plea hearings as a result of the court's 2019 ruling in Rehaif v. United States which narrowed a federal law barring people with felony convictions from possessing guns
In a relatively quiet Monday morning order list, SCOTUS takes up no new cases. But it does invite the federal government to submit a brief on the pending petition that asks the justices to take up a challenge to Harvard's affirmative action policy. https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/061421zor_6j36.pdf
The Supreme Court will release orders at 9:30 a.m. ET followed by opinion(s?) at 10:00.
There are 21 opinions outstanding including Obamacare, LGBTQ+ rights vs. religious liberty, and student speech.
We’ll crank up the live blog at 9:25. Join us!
Announcement of orders and opinions for Monday, June 14 - SCOTUSblog
We will be live blogging on Monday, June 14, as the court releases orders from the June 10 conference and one ...
Released today: annual financial disclosures for eight of the nine justices. Key takeaways: substantial book-royalty income for Sotomayor and Gorsuch; reduced travel reimbursements across the board during the pandemic.
Full story from @AHoweBlogger:
Less travel, plenty of royalties for justices in 2020 - SCOTUSblog
The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic were reflected in an unusual source: the justices’ 2020 financial disclosur...
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.