|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|12-9490||Cal. App. 1st. Dist.||Jan 21, 2014||Apr 22, 2014||5-4||Thomas||OT 2013|
Holding: Under the totality of the circumstances, the traffic stop precipitated by an anonymous but reliable tip to 911 complied with the Fourth Amendment because the officer had reasonable suspicion that the truck’s driver was intoxicated.
Judgment: Affirmed, 5-4, in an opinion by Justice Thomas on April 22, 2014. Justice Scalia filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Ginsburg, Justice Sotomayor, and Justice Kagan joined.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Mar 29 2013||Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 1, 2013)|
|Apr 8 2013||Waiver of right of respondent California to respond filed.|
|Apr 24 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 9, 2013.|
|May 13 2013||The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until June 3, 2013, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.|
|May 31 2013||Petitioners complied with order of May 13, 2013.|
|Jun 5 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 20, 2013.|
|Jun 11 2013||Response Requested . (Due July 11, 2013)|
|Jul 9 2013||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including August 12, 2013.|
|Aug 9 2013||Brief of respondent California in opposition filed.|
|Aug 16 2013||Reply of petitioners Lorenzo Prado Navarette and Jose Prado Navarette filed.|
|Aug 22 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 30, 2013.|
|Oct 1 2013||Petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.|
|Oct 10 2013||Motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis filed by petitioners Lorenzo Prado Navarette and Jose Prado Navarette.|
|Oct 10 2013||Motion to appoint counsel filed by petitioners Lorenzo Prado Navarette and Jose Prado Navarette.|
|Oct 28 2013||Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 1, 2013.|
|Nov 4 2013||Motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis GRANTED.|
|Nov 4 2013||Motion to appoint counsel filed by petitioners GRANTED. Paul Kleven, Esquire, of Berkeley, California, is appointed to serve as counsel for the petitioners in this case.|
|Nov 4 2013||SET FOR ARGUMENT Tuesday, January 21, 2014.|
|Nov 15 2013||Joint appendix filed.|
|Nov 15 2013||Brief of petitioners Lorenzo Prado Navarette and Jose Prado Navarette filed.|
|Nov 21 2013||CIRCULATED.|
|Nov 21 2013||Brief amici curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 16 2013||Brief of respondent California filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 23 2013||Brief amicus curiae of the United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 23 2013||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.|
|Dec 23 2013||Brief amici curiae of Florida, 31 Other States, and the District of Columbia filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 27 2013||Record Received from U.S.C.A. 1st Appellate District. The record is electronic (Not on PACER).|
|Jan 10 2014||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.|
|Jan 13 2014||Reply of petitioners Lorenzo Prado Navarette and Jose Prado Navarette filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 21 2014||Argued. For petitioners: Paul R. Kleven, Berkeley, Cal. (Appointed by this Court.) For respondent: Jeffrey M. K. Laurence, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, San Francisco, Cal.; and Rachel P. Kovner, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.)|
|Apr 22 2014||Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Thomas, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Kennedy, Breyer, and Alito, JJ., joined. Scalia, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined.|
|May 27 2014||MANDATE ISSUED.|
The Supreme Court sides with Sen. Ted Cruz in his First Amendment challenge to a federal campaign-finance law that limits how and when candidates can recoup loans that they make to their own campaigns. The vote is 6-3 along ideological lines.
In an immigration case, SCOTUS rules 5-4 that federal courts do NOT have jurisdiction to review certain executive-branch factual findings that determine whether non-citizens are eligible for "adjustment of status." Those findings can dictate whether a person is deported.
SCOTUS agrees to take up two new cases: Jones v. Hendrix (a habeas corpus case) and SEC v. Cochran (a case about the power of district courts to hear challenges to the constitutionality of the SEC's administrative law proceedings). Full order list here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/051622zor_hgcj.pdf
We're live now on SCOTUSblog's homepage or at https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/05/announcement-of-orders-and-opinions-for-monday-may-16/
Today at SCOTUS: The court will issue one or more opinions in argued cases at 10 a.m. EDT. But first, orders on pending petitions at 9:30. We'll fire up our live blog at 9:25 to break it all down and answer your questions. Grab some ☕️ and come join us: https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/05/announcement-of-orders-and-opinions-for-monday-may-16/
Today at SCOTUS: The court will issue one or more opinions in argued cases at 10 a.m. EDT. But first, orders on pending petitions at 9:30. We'll fire up our live blog at 9:25 to break it all down and answer your questions. Grab some ☕️ and come join us:
Announcement of orders and opinions for Monday, May 16 - SCOTUSblog
On Monday, May 16, we will be live blogging as the court releases orders from the May 12 conference and opinio...
We can announce, however, that we'll be liveblogging the release of orders from today's conference AND opinions, starting at around 9:25 @SCOTUSblog. Please join us to discuss the leak, pending opinions, and whatever other SCOTUS-related issues are on your mind. https://twitter.com/AHoweBlogger/status/1524788054434660353
#SCOTUS will release opinions from argued cases at 10 am on Monday. The Court does not announce in advance how many opinions it will release or which ones.