Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
15-1251 | D.C. Cir. | Nov 7, 2016 | Mar 21, 2017 | 6-2 | Roberts | OT 2016 |
Disclosure: Vinson & Elkins LLP, whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.
Holding: (1) Subsection (b)(1) of the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998, which prevents a person who has been nominated to fill a vacant office requiring presidential appointment and Senate confirmation from performing the duties of that office in an acting capacity, applies to anyone performing acting service under the FVRA and is not limited to first assistants performing acting service under Subsection (a)(1); and (2) Subsection (b)(1) prohibited Lafe Solomon from continuing his service as acting general counsel of the National Labor Relations Board once the president nominated him to fill the position permanently.
Judgment: Affirmed, 6-2, in an opinion by Chief Justice Roberts on March 21, 2017. Justice Thomas filed a concurring opinion. Justice Sotomayor filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Ginsburg joined.
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
Apr 6 2016 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 9, 2016) |
May 9 2016 | Brief of respondent SW General, Inc., dba Southwest Ambulance in opposition filed. |
May 24 2016 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 9, 2016. |
May 24 2016 | Reply of petitioner National Labor Relations Board filed. (Distributed) |
Jun 10 2016 | Letter dated June 9, 2016, received from the Solicitor General calling the Court's attention to a new decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. (Distributed) |
Jun 13 2016 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 16, 2016. |
Jun 20 2016 | Petition GRANTED. |
Jun 30 2016 | The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including August 12, 2016. |
Jun 30 2016 | The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including September 19, 2016. |
Aug 5 2016 | Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner National Labor Relations Board. |
Aug 12 2016 | Brief of petitioner National Labor Relations Board filed. |
Aug 18 2016 | Brief amicus curiae of American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations filed. |
Aug 19 2016 | Brief amicus curiae of Constitutional Accountability Center filed. |
Sep 2 2016 | SET FOR ARGUMENT On Monday, November 7, 2016 |
Sep 9 2016 | Record has been requested from the U.S.C.A. District of Columbia Circuit. |
Sep 19 2016 | Brief of respondent SW General, Inc., dba Southwest Ambulance filed. |
Sep 23 2016 | Record received from the U.S.C.A. District of Columbia Circuit is electronic and located on PACER. |
Sep 23 2016 | Brief amicus curiae of Southeastern Legal Foundation filed. |
Sep 26 2016 | Brief amicus curiae of Morton Rosenberg filed. |
Sep 26 2016 | Brief amici curiae of Washington Legal Foundation and Allied Educational Foundation filed. |
Sep 26 2016 | Brief amici curiae of National Federation of Independent Business, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
Sep 26 2016 | Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States filed. (Distributed) |
Sep 26 2016 | Brief amici curiae of Senators John McCain and Thom Tillis urging affirmance filed. (Distributed) |
Sep 26 2016 | Brief amici curiae of West Virginia, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
Sep 26 2016 | Brief amicus curiae of Cato Institute filed. (Distributed) |
Sep 28 2016 | CIRCULATED |
Oct 3 2016 | Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner GRANTED. |
Oct 19 2016 | Reply of petitioner National Labor Relations Board filed. (Distributed) |
Nov 7 2016 | Argued. For petitioner: Ian H. Gershengorn, Acting Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Shay Dvoretzky, Washington, D. C. |
Mar 21 2017 | Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Roberts, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Kennedy, Thomas, Breyer, Alito, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Thomas, J., filed a concurring opinion. Sotomayor, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Ginsburg, J., joined. |
Apr 24 2017 | JUDGMENT ISSUED |
Wait wut.. RBG ghost-wrote the equal protection bits of Obergefell?!
And I learned this on @SCOTUSblog’s TikTok?! https://www.tiktok.com/@scotusblog/video/6922179577724931333
"This is not our first commission rodeo” says Levy. 😉
Love this write up of the @BrookingsInst's panel yesterday with @Susan_Hennessey, @danepps,@cdkang76, and @mollyereynolds.
Thanks, @SCOTUSblog and Kalvis Golde!
https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/01/with-democrats-in-control-supreme-court-reform-proposals-reclaim-center-stage/
Spilling SCOTUS tea on TikTok today. Well, actually, @eskridgebill spilled the tea, we just tok’d about it. 🍵
https://balkin.blogspot.com/2021/01/marriage-equality-and-sex.html
The Supreme Court got rid of several cases this morning -- in one fell swoop. Read @AHoweBlogger's latest coverage of the emoluments cases, spiritual advisers at Texas executions, Texas abortion policies, COVID restrictions, and NY political corruption.
Justices vacate rulings on Trump and emoluments - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court on Monday morning released orders from the justices’ private conference on Friday, Jan. 22. The justices once again did not ac...
www.scotusblog.com
In this morning's orders list, SCOTUS took no action on pending cert petitions involving:
- Mississippi's near-ban on abortions after 15 weeks,
- a Trump rule banning Title X clinics from providing abortion referrals,
- the Trump administration's "public charge" immigration rule.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.