|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|15-1251||D.C. Cir.||Nov 7, 2016||Mar 21, 2017||6-2||Roberts||OT 2016|
Disclosure: Vinson & Elkins LLP, whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.
Holding: (1) Subsection (b)(1) of the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998, which prevents a person who has been nominated to fill a vacant office requiring presidential appointment and Senate confirmation from performing the duties of that office in an acting capacity, applies to anyone performing acting service under the FVRA and is not limited to first assistants performing acting service under Subsection (a)(1); and (2) Subsection (b)(1) prohibited Lafe Solomon from continuing his service as acting general counsel of the National Labor Relations Board once the president nominated him to fill the position permanently.
Judgment: Affirmed, 6-2, in an opinion by Chief Justice Roberts on March 21, 2017. Justice Thomas filed a concurring opinion. Justice Sotomayor filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Ginsburg joined.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Apr 6 2016||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 9, 2016)|
|May 9 2016||Brief of respondent SW General, Inc., dba Southwest Ambulance in opposition filed.|
|May 24 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 9, 2016.|
|May 24 2016||Reply of petitioner National Labor Relations Board filed. (Distributed)|
|Jun 10 2016||Letter dated June 9, 2016, received from the Solicitor General calling the Court's attention to a new decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. (Distributed)|
|Jun 13 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 16, 2016.|
|Jun 20 2016||Petition GRANTED.|
|Jun 30 2016||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including August 12, 2016.|
|Jun 30 2016||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including September 19, 2016.|
|Aug 5 2016||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner National Labor Relations Board.|
|Aug 12 2016||Brief of petitioner National Labor Relations Board filed.|
|Aug 18 2016||Brief amicus curiae of American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations filed.|
|Aug 19 2016||Brief amicus curiae of Constitutional Accountability Center filed.|
|Sep 2 2016||SET FOR ARGUMENT On Monday, November 7, 2016|
|Sep 9 2016||Record has been requested from the U.S.C.A. District of Columbia Circuit.|
|Sep 19 2016||Brief of respondent SW General, Inc., dba Southwest Ambulance filed.|
|Sep 23 2016||Record received from the U.S.C.A. District of Columbia Circuit is electronic and located on PACER.|
|Sep 23 2016||Brief amicus curiae of Southeastern Legal Foundation filed.|
|Sep 26 2016||Brief amicus curiae of Morton Rosenberg filed.|
|Sep 26 2016||Brief amici curiae of Washington Legal Foundation and Allied Educational Foundation filed.|
|Sep 26 2016||Brief amici curiae of National Federation of Independent Business, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Sep 26 2016||Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Sep 26 2016||Brief amici curiae of Senators John McCain and Thom Tillis urging affirmance filed. (Distributed)|
|Sep 26 2016||Brief amici curiae of West Virginia, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Sep 26 2016||Brief amicus curiae of Cato Institute filed. (Distributed)|
|Sep 28 2016||CIRCULATED|
|Oct 3 2016||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner GRANTED.|
|Oct 19 2016||Reply of petitioner National Labor Relations Board filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 7 2016||Argued. For petitioner: Ian H. Gershengorn, Acting Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Shay Dvoretzky, Washington, D. C.|
|Mar 21 2017||Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Roberts, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Kennedy, Thomas, Breyer, Alito, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Thomas, J., filed a concurring opinion. Sotomayor, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Ginsburg, J., joined.|
|Apr 24 2017||JUDGMENT ISSUED|
We can announce, however, that we'll be liveblogging the release of orders from today's conference AND opinions, starting at around 9:25 @SCOTUSblog. Please join us to discuss the leak, pending opinions, and whatever other SCOTUS-related issues are on your mind. https://twitter.com/AHoweBlogger/status/1524788054434660353
#SCOTUS will release opinions from argued cases at 10 am on Monday. The Court does not announce in advance how many opinions it will release or which ones.
NEW: Next Monday will be a Supreme Court opinion day. Starting at 10 a.m. EDT, the court expects to issue one or more decisions in argued cases from the current term.
Just in: The Supreme Court denies a request to block the execution of Clarence Dixon, an Arizona man who is scheduled to be put to death today. Dixon's attorneys argued that, because of a mental illness, Dixon is not mentally fit to be executed under the Eighth Amendment.
On this date in “How Appealing” history: At this very moment twenty years ago, this blog came into existence, boosting your humble author from nearly total obscurity to perhaps a modicum less than nearly total obscurity.
On this happy occasion, I once https://howappealing.abovethelaw.com/2022/05/06/#179553
How the unprecedented Supreme Court leak may have been a response to an earlier disclosure about the justices' private deliberations. @TomGoldsteinSB on what it all means for the court and its secrets.
How the leak might have happened - SCOTUSblog
Among the debates generated by the leak of Justice Samuel Alito’s opinion in Dobbs is whether the leaker was...
JUST IN: The Supreme Court confirms the authenticity of the draft opinion revealed last night by Politico. The chief justice has ordered an investigation into the leak.