|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
Mar 22, 2021
Mar 31, 2021
Issue: Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit erroneously held, in conflict with decisions of other circuits and general antitrust principles, that the National Collegiate Athletic Association eligibility rules regarding compensation of student-athletes violate federal antitrust law.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Oct 15 2020||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 18, 2020)|
|Nov 09 2020||Brief of respondents Shawne Alston, et al. in opposition filed. VIDED.|
|Nov 13 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Sam C. Ehrlich filed. VIDED.|
|Nov 18 2020||Brief amici curiae of Antitrust Law And Business School Professors filed.|
|Nov 18 2020||Brief amici curiae of Antitrust Economists filed. VIDED. (Distributed)|
|Nov 24 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/11/2020.|
|Nov 24 2020||Reply of petitioner National Collegiate Athletic Association filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 16 2020||Petition GRANTED. The petition for a writ of certiorari in No. 20-520 is granted. The cases are consolidated, and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument. VIDED.|
|Dec 16 2020||Because the Court has consolidated these cases for briefing and oral argument, future filings and activity in the cases will now be reflected on the docket of No. 20-512. Subsequent filings in these cases must therefore be submitted through the electronic filing system in No. 20-512. Each document submitted in connection with one or more of these cases must include on its cover the case number and caption for each case in which the filing is intended to be submitted. Where a filing is submitted in fewer than all of the cases, the docket entry will reflect the case number(s) in which the filing is submitted; a document filed in all of the consolidated cases will be noted as “VIDED.”|
|Dec 21 2020||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioners National Collegiate Athletic Association. VIDED.|
|Jan 04 2021||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, National Collegiate Athletic Association|
|Jan 08 2021||Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, Shawne Alston, et al.|
|Jan 11 2021||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioners GRANTED. VIDED.|
|Jan 27 2021||Brief amicus curiae of Sam C. Ehrlich in support of neither party filed. VIDED.|
|Feb 01 2021||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, March 31, 2021. VIDED.|
|Feb 01 2021||Brief of petitioner National Collegiate Athletic Association filed (in 20-512).|
|Feb 01 2021||Brief of petitioners American Athletic Conference, et al. filed (in 20-520).|
|Feb 04 2021||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit.|
|Feb 04 2021||Record from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit is electronic and located on Pacer. Part of the record is SEALED and has been electronically filed.|
|Feb 05 2021||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, The Big Ten Conference, Inc.|
|Feb 05 2021||Brief amicus curiae of National Federation Of State High School Associations filed (in 20-512).|
|Feb 08 2021||Brief amici curiae of American Council on Education and Ten Other Higher Education Associations filed. VIDED.|
|Feb 08 2021||Brief amicus curiae of Thomas B. Nachbar filed. VIDED|
|Feb 08 2021||Brief amici curiae of Antitrust Law And Business School Professors filed. VIDED.|
|Feb 08 2021||Brief amici curiae of Antitrust Economists filed. VIDED.|
|Feb 08 2021||Brief amici curiae of Georgia, et al. filed. VIDED.|
|Feb 08 2021||Brief amici curiae of Former Student-Athletes filed. VIDED.|
|Feb 18 2021||Application (20A145) to extend the time to file the reply briefs on the merits from 2 p.m., March 19, 2021 to 2 p.m., March 21, 2021, submitted to Justice Kagan. VIDED.|
|Feb 22 2021||CIRCULATED.|
|Feb 24 2021||Application (20A145) denied by Justice Kagan. VIDED.|
NEW: SCOTUS agrees to take up two new cases. Here's the orders list. https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/030121zor_m6hn.pdf
#SCOTUS grants US v. Vaello-Madero, a challenge to exclusion of Puerto Rico residents from eligibility for Supplemental Social Security Income program, which provides benefits to poor disabled adults & children
Good morning. It’s Monday, and it’s March!
At 9:30 a.m. EST, SCOTUS will release orders from Friday’s conference.
At 10:00, the court will consider an appointments clause challenge to administrative patent judges. More from George Quillin & Jeanne Gills.
Justices to consider appointments clause challenge to administrative patent judges - SCOTUSblog
The justices continue their light load for the February argument session next week. First up is Monday’s Unite...
BREAKING: SCOTUS orders California’s Santa Clara County to allow churches to hold indoor services. Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan dissent. Here’s the short shadow docket order.
#SCOTUS grants emergency request from northern California churches to allow indoor worship services pending appeal, says result is "clearly dictated" by recent decision. Kagan dissents, joined by Breyer & Sotomayor: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/022621zr_1bo2.pdf
Just in: SCOTUS opinions expected next Thursday.
#SCOTUS website indicates that the Court will release orders from today's conference on Monday morning, March 1, at 9:30 am, with opinions again on Thursday, March 4, at 10 am. Justices will also hear oral arguments next week, including in Arizona voting dispute on Tuesday.
Apparently all the action today at #SCOTUS was not limited to opinion announcements at 10 am. Major new cert. petition filed today challenging Harvard admissions policy. https://twitter.com/GregStohr/status/1364962610177843210
NEW: Supreme Court asked to outlaw race-based college admissions. Group challenging Harvard admissions policy says it files appeal asking court to over 2003 Grutter decision.
SCOTUS rules against a college student who tried to sue police officers after they mistook him for a criminal suspect and tackled/beat him. The unanimous ruling involves a technical interpretation of the "judgment bar" under the Federal Tort Claims Act. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/19-546_7mip.pdf
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.