|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|18-6210||Wis.||Apr 23, 2019||Jun 27, 2019||5-4||Alito||OT 2018|
Holding: The Wisconsin Supreme Court’s judgment – affirming the drunk-driving convictions of Gerald Mitchell, who was administered a warrantless blood test while he was unconscious – is vacated, and the case is remanded.
Judgment: Vacated and remanded, 5-4, in an opinion by Justice Alito on June 27, 2019. Justice Thomas filed a concurring opinion. Justice Sotomayor filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justices Ginsburg and Kagan joined. Justice Gorsuch filed a dissenting opinion.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Oct 01 2018||Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 5, 2018)|
|Oct 16 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 5, 2018 to December 5, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Oct 18 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 5, 2018.|
|Dec 05 2018||Brief of respondent Wisconsin in opposition filed.|
|Dec 19 2018||Reply of petitioner Gerald P. Mitchell filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 20 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.|
|Jan 07 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/11/2019.|
|Jan 11 2019||Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED.|
|Feb 11 2019||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, April 23, 2019|
|Feb 18 2019||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Gerald P. Mitchell.|
|Feb 18 2019||Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, Wisconsin|
|Feb 25 2019||Joint appendix filed.|
|Feb 25 2019||Brief of petitioner Gerald P. Mitchell filed.|
|Feb 26 2019||Brief amicus curiae of California DUI Lawyers Association filed.|
|Mar 01 2019||Brief amicus curiae of National College for DUI Defense, Inc. filed.|
|Mar 04 2019||Supplemental proof of service of amicus California DUI Lawyers Association filed.|
|Mar 04 2019||Brief amici curiae of The Rutherford Institute and the Cato Institute filed.|
|Mar 04 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Restore the Fourth, Inc. filed.|
|Mar 04 2019||Brief amici curiae of The DKT Liberty Project, Reason Foundation, and The Due Process Institute filed.|
|Mar 04 2019||Brief amici curiae of the American Civil Liberties Union and ACLU of Wisconsin filed.|
|Mar 04 2019||Brief amicus curiae of DUI Defense Lawyers Association filed.|
|Mar 20 2019||CIRCULATED|
|Mar 27 2019||Brief of respondent Wisconsin filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 03 2019||Brief amici curiae of National Conference of State Legislatures, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 03 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Mothers Against Drunk Driving filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 03 2019||Brief amici curiae of League of Wisconsin Municipalities, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 03 2019||Brief amici curiae of State of Colorado, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 16 2019||Reply of petitioner Gerald P. Mitchell filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 23 2019||Argued. For petitioner: Andrew R. Hinkel, Assistant State Public Defender, Madison, Wis. For respondent: Hannah S. Jurss, Assistant Attorney General, Madison, Wis.|
|Jun 27 2019||Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Alito, J., announced the judgment of the Court and delivered an opinion, in which Roberts, C. J., and Breyer and Kavanaugh, JJ., joined. Thomas, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment. Sotomayor, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Ginsburg and Kagan, JJ., joined. Gorsuch, J., filed a dissenting opinion.|
|Jul 29 2019||MANDATE SSUED.|
|Jul 29 2019||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
Having covered the Supreme Court for six decades, @lylden has seen a lot of changes at 1 First Street. In the latest piece in our series on the post-COVID court, Lyle examines how the court's pandemic operations could spur permanent reform.
How has COVID-19 changed the Supreme Court? And are any of those changes worth keeping? Today we launch a symposium examining those questions.
First up, a piece from @stevenmazie on how to reform oral arguments after the pandemic.
The court after COVID: A recipe for oral argument reform - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court has not yet announced whether it will return to normal operations when the 2021-22 term begins ...
NEW shadow-docket case: New York landlords ask SCOTUS for an emergency order to prevent the state from continuing to enforce its COVID-related eviction moratorium. They say the moratorium "runs roughshod" over their constitutional rights.
Filing here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A8-1.pdf
New on the shadow docket: Florida seeks an emergency order blocking CDC policies that substantially limit cruise ships from sailing.
Florida asks #SCOTUS to block, pending appeal, CDC restrictions imposed on cruise industry b/c of COVID-19 pandemic: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A5.pdf
NEW: Mississippi formally asks the Supreme Court to overturn its landmark abortion case, Roe v. Wade, in latest court filing. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1392/184703/20210722161332385_19-1392BriefForPetitioners.pdf
Biden’s SCOTUS reform commission met yesterday and discussed several reform ideas including adding justices and adopting a formal code of ethics.
Term limits emerged as a popular idea. But how to implement it — via statute or constitutional amendment?
Term limits emerge as popular proposal at latest meeting of court-reform commission - SCOTUSblog
The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court reconvened on Tuesday to hear from a new set of experts on vari...
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.