|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|14-1458||9th Cir.||TBD||TBD||TBD||TBD||OT 15|
Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in this case.
Issue: Whether California's arbitration-only severability rule is preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Apr 3 2015||Application (14A1031) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 10, 2015 to June 10, 2015, submitted to Justice Kennedy.|
|Apr 8 2015||Application (14A1031) granted by Justice Kennedy extending the time to file until June 10, 2015.|
|Jun 10 2015||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 13, 2015)|
|Jul 1 2015||Waiver of right of respondents Thomas Zaborowski, et al. to respond filed.|
|Jul 10 2015||Brief amici curiae of Atlantic Legal Foundation, and The International Association of Defense Counsel filed.|
|Jul 13 2015||Brief amicus curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation filed. (Distributed)|
|Jul 13 2015||Brief amici curiae of Mary A. Bedikian, Daniel Barnhizer and George T. Roumell, Jr. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jul 15 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 28, 2015.|
|Jul 23 2015||Response Requested . (Due August 24, 2015)|
|Aug 24 2015||Brief of respondents Thomas Zaborowski, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Sep 8 2015||Reply of petitioners MHN Government Services, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Sep 9 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 28, 2015.|
|Oct 1 2015||Petition GRANTED.|
|Oct 23 2015||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioners' brief on the merits is extended to and including November 25, 2015.|
|Oct 23 2015||The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is extended to and including January 8, 2016.|
|Nov 2 2015||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs in support of either party or of neither party received from counsel for the respondents.|
|Nov 5 2015||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs in support of either party or of neither party received from counsel for the petitioners.|
|Nov 25 2015||Joint appendix filed.|
|Nov 25 2015||Brief of petitioners MHN Government Services, Inc., et al. filed.|
|Dec 2 2015||Brief amicus curiae of Equal Employment Advisory Council filed.|
|Dec 2 2015||Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America filed.|
|Dec 2 2015||Brief amicus curiae of The Employers Group filed.|
|Dec 2 2015||Brief amicus curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation filed.|
|Dec 2 2015||Brief amici curiae of Atlantic Legal Foundation, and The International Association of Defense Counsel filed.|
|Dec 2 2015||Brief amicus curiae of DRI - The Voice of the Defense Bar filed.|
|Dec 23 2015||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, February 24, 2016|
|Dec 30 2015||The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is further extended to and including January 15, 2016.|
|Jan 7 2016||Letter from counsel for the petitioners received.|
|Jan 7 2016||CASE REMOVED FROM ARGUMENT CALENDAR for Wednesday, February 24, 2016.|
|Apr 8 2016||Motion to dismiss the writ of certiorari pursuant to Rule 46 received.|
|Apr 11 2016||Letter of consent to the motion to dismiss the writ of certiorari pursuant to Rule 46 received.|
|Apr 12 2016||Petition Dismissed - Rule 46.|
Bill Cosby’s prosecutors asked the Supreme Court to reinstate his conviction today. Quick explainer.
In our latest episode of SCOTUStalk, @shefalil of @19thnews joined us to preview Wednesday's argument in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health. Shefali explains the current state of abortion access and the case's implications in Mississippi and across America.
Roe, Dobbs, and the current state of abortion access - SCOTUSblog
In advance of Wednesday's oral argument in the momentous abortion case, Shefali Luthra, a gender and health care r...
Update: Without calling for a response or referring the case to the full court, Justice Breyer just rejected last week's challenge from Massachusetts hospital workers who object to the hospital's COVID vaccine mandate.
(Breyer handles emergency requests from Massachusetts.)
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket challenge to a COVID vaccine mandate. This one is from employees at Mass General Brigham who say the Boston-based hospital violated federal law by not granting them exemptions from the hospital's vaccine policy. Filing here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/21A175.pdf
Today at SCOTUS: The justices return to the bench for oral argument in a case about Medicare payments to hospitals that serve low-income patients. Lots of money at stake, plus potential implications for the Chevron doctrine. @JACoganJr explains the case:
Money for safety-net hospitals at stake in dispute over Medicare payment formula - SCOTUSblog
When it comes to highlighting the complexity of the Medicare Act and its hospital payment rules, Becerra v. Empire...
Two days from now, SCOTUS will hear the biggest abortion case in a generation. In a battle over a Mississippi law, abortion opponents are asking the court to end the constitutional right to abortion. Here's our preview of the case, via @AHoweBlogger.
Roe v. Wade hangs in balance as reshaped court prepares to hear biggest abortion case in decades - SCOTUSblog
When he ran for president in 2016, then-candidate Donald Trump promised to nominate Supreme Court justices who would...
JUST IN: One new cert grant this morning: Berger v. North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP. More on the case here: https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/berger-v-north-carolina-state-conference-of-the-naacp/
#SCOTUS adds one new case to its merits docket this morning: Berger v. NC Conference of NAACP, in which the justices will weigh in on an effort by Republican legislators in the state to intervene to defend the state’s voter-ID law. Here's the order: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/112421zr_7li8.pdf