|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|14-1132||3d Cir.||Dec 1, 2015||May 16, 2016||8-0||Kagan||OT 2015|
Holding: The jurisdictional test established by Section 27 of the federal Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is the same as the test of the general federal-question statute, Section 1331, for deciding if a case "arises under" a federal law.
Judgment: Affirmed, 8-0, in an opinion by Justice Kagan on May 16, 2016. Justice Thomas filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, in which Justice Sotomayor joined.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Mar 17 2015||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 17, 2015)|
|Apr 16 2015||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association.|
|Apr 16 2015||Waiver of right of respondents Greg Manning, et al. to respond filed.|
|Apr 28 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 14, 2015.|
|May 1 2015||Response Requested . (Due June 1, 2015)|
|May 6 2015||Application (14A1143) to extend the time to file the response to the petition for a writ of certiorari from June 1, 2015 to June 16, 2015, submitted to Justice Alito.|
|May 7 2015||Applicaton withdrawn.|
|May 8 2015||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including June 5, 2015.|
|Jun 5 2015||Brief of respondents Greg Manning, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Jun 9 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 25, 2015.|
|Jun 10 2015||Reply of petitioners Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jun 25 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 29, 2015.|
|Jun 30 2015||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association GRANTED.|
|Jun 30 2015||Petition GRANTED.|
|Aug 4 2015||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioners' brief on the merits is extended to and including September 3, 2015.|
|Aug 4 2015||The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is extended to and including October 23, 2015.|
|Aug 18 2015||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioners Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., et al.|
|Aug 31 2015||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondents.|
|Sep 3 2015||Brief of petitioners Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., et al. filed.|
|Sep 3 2015||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioners.|
|Sep 10 2015||Brief amicus curiae of Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association filed.|
|Sep 10 2015||Brief amici curiae of NASDAQ, Inc., et al. filed.|
|Sep 10 2015||Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America filed.|
|Sep 10 2015||Brief amici curiae of Natural Gas Supply Association, et al. filed.|
|Sep 10 2015||Brief amicus curiae of Interstate Natural Gas Association of America filed.|
|Oct 5 2015||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner GRANTED.|
|Oct 9 2015||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, December 1, 2015|
|Oct 19 2015||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 3rd Circuit.|
|Oct 23 2015||Record received from the U.S.C.A. 3rd Circuit is electronic.|
|Oct 23 2015||Record received from the U.S.D.C. District of New Jersey is electronic.|
|Oct 23 2015||Brief of respondents Greg Manning, et al. filed.|
|Oct 27 2015||CIRCULATED.|
|Oct 30 2015||Brief amicus curiae of Public Citizen, Inc. filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 30 2015||Brief amicus curiae of North American Securities Administrators Association filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 30 2015||Brief amicus curiae of AARP filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 23 2015||Reply of petitioners Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 1 2015||Argued. For petitioners: Jonathan D. Hacker, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Peter K. Stris, Los Angeles, Cal.|
|May 16 2016||Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Kagan, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, and Alito, JJ., joined. Thomas, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, in which Sotomayor, J., joined.|
|Jun 17 2016||JUDGMENT ISSUED|
The clerk of the court just notified counsel in a juvenile sentencing case—that was sent back to a lower court this week in light of the court's decision in Jones v. Mississippi—that Justice Kagan unwittingly failed to recuse herself after participating in part of the case as SG.
It’s a quiet week, so now is a great time to listen to Judge John Owens regale @AHoweBlogger with the tale of Ashton Embry and the greatest leak in Supreme Court history.
Come for the high drama, stay for the good humor and an RBG story or two.
The biggest leak in Supreme Court history - SCOTUSblog
In a city full of anonymous sources, the Supreme Court is famously leak-proof. But a century ago, the court had ...
The US Supreme Court should overturn the Facebook’s “Oversight Board’s” “ruling” which upholds the outlawing of the 45th President of the United States from social media.
This is a big tech, corporate oligarchy without standing and it’s gone too far. Enough is enough.
The Supreme Court will hear its last case of the term today at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Here’s a summary of Terry v. United States in a TikTok minute.
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will tackle the legacy of the Reagan-era War on Drugs and Congress' attempt to reduce the punishment disparity between crack-cocaine and powder cocaine offenses.
As @ekownyankah notes, this case has a little bit of everything.
In final case the court will hear this term, profound issues of race, incarceration and the war on drugs - SCOTUSblog
Academics naturally believe that even obscure cases in their field are underappreciated; each minor tax or bankruptcy ...
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket filing in which a church argues that state COVID-related restrictions lack sufficient carveouts for religious worship. This one challenges Colorado's restrictions. It relies heavily on last month's ruling in Tandon v. Newsom.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.