|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|19-814||4th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2019|
Issue: Whether officers can presume that a person is “armed and presently dangerous” simply because the person possesses any amount of marijuana, however small.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Nov 06 2019||Application (19A514) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 24, 2019 to December 26, 2019, submitted to The Chief Justice.|
|Nov 12 2019||Application (19A514) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until December 26, 2019.|
|Dec 26 2019||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 27, 2020)|
|Jan 21 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 27, 2020 to February 26, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jan 22 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 26, 2020.|
|Jan 27 2020||Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed.|
|Feb 13 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 26, 2020 to March 27, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Feb 14 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including March 27, 2020.|
|Mar 12 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 27, 2020 to May 14, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Mar 13 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 14, 2020.|
|May 14 2020||Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.|
|May 19 2020||Motion of petitioner to delay distribution of the petition for a writ of certiorari under Rule 15.5 from June 2, 2020 to June 9, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|May 20 2020||Motion to delay distribution of the petition for a writ certiorari until June 9, 2020, granted.|
|Jun 09 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/25/2020.|
|Jun 09 2020||Reply of petitioner Tony Deshawn McCoy filed. (Distributed)|
|Jun 29 2020||Petition DENIED.|
SCOTUS rules against immigrant who has lived in the US without authorization for decades. The gov't sought to deport him based on a state misdemeanor conviction (he used a fake Social Security card to get a job). SCOTUS says 5-3 he's not eligible to seek protection from removal.
NEW: In Freedom of Information Act case, SCOTUS says federal government does not have to disclose documents that were produced as part of a rulemaking on "cooling water intake structures" under the Clean Water Act. The Sierra Club argued the docs should be disclosed under FOIA.
At 10:00 a.m. EST, the Supreme Court will hand down one or more opinions in argued cases.
We’ll be live blogging through it at 9:45 with @AHoweBlogger, Mark Walsh, and @jamesromoser.
Announcement of opinions for Thursday, March 4 - SCOTUSblog
We will be live blogging on Thursday, March 4, as the court releases opinions from the 2020-21 term. This live ...
SCOTUS will hear oral argument at 10:00 a.m. EST about when claimants must raise claims in the administrative process – “exhausting” their administrative remedies. Read more from Ronald Mann.
It might sound exhausting! But we claim it might be fun.
Justices to weigh issue exhaustion for Social Security claimants - SCOTUSblog
Wednesday’s argument in Carr v. Saul involves a surprisingly basic question of administrative law: when claimants ...
Who you calling “shrinking”? — the shadow docket
With #SCOTUS’s shrinking docket, we have to wonder if @SCOTUSblog will become a bi-monthly publication.
The Supreme Court will take up voting rights this morning.
Oral argument begins at 10:00 a.m. EST.
Justices to consider whether Arizona’s voting rules discriminate against minorities - SCOTUSblog
The 2020 elections may be over, but the Supreme Court will soon hear oral argument in a pair of voting-rights ...
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.