Reyes Mata v. Lynch

Docket No.	Op. Below	Argument	Opinion	Vote	Author	Term
14-185	5th Cir.	Apr 29, 2015 Tr.Aud.	Jun 15, 2015	8-1	Kagan	OT 2014

Holding: A court of appeals has jurisdiction to review the rejection by the Board of Immigration Appeals of a non-citizen’s motion to reopen, even when the Board rejects the motion as untimely or it rejects a motion requesting equitable tolling of the time limit.

Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 8-1, in an opinion by Justice Kagan on June 15, 2015. Justice Thomas filed a dissenting opinion.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

A View from the Courtroom: The Goldbergs (Mark Walsh)
Opinion analysis: Distinguishing between jurisdiction over (and the merits of) untimely immigration appeals (Steve Vladeck)
Argument analysis: The easy way or the hard way to decide an untimely immigration appeal? (Steve Vladeck)
Argument preview: What happens when deadlines in removal proceedings are missed due to ineffective assistance of counsel? (Steve Vladeck)
Petition of the day (Maureen Johnston)

Date	Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
Aug 14 2014	Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 17, 2014)
Sep 17 2014	Order extending time to file response to petition to and including October 17, 2014.
Oct 9 2014	Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including November 17, 2014.
Nov 17 2014	Brief of respondent Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General filed.
Dec 2 2014	Reply of petitioner Noel Reyes Mata filed.
Dec 3 2014	DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 9, 2015.
Jan 12 2015	DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 16, 2015.
Jan 13 2015	Record received from U.S.C.A. 5th Circuit. The record is electronic.
Jan 16 2015	Petition GRANTED. William Peterson, Esquire, of Houston, Texas, is invited to brief and argue this case, as amicus curiae, in support of the judgment below.
Feb 27 2015	Deferred appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed.)
Feb 27 2015	Brief of petitioner Noel Reyes Mata filed.
Feb 27 2015	Brief of respondent Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General supporting reversal and remand filed.
Mar 5 2015	Brief amicus curiae of National Immigrant Justice Center filed.
Mar 6 2015	SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Wednesday, April 29, 2015
Mar 6 2015	Brief amici curiae of The American Immigration Council, et al. filed.
Mar 16 2015	CIRCULATED.
Mar 30 2015	Brief of Court-appointed amicus curiae in support of the judgment below filed. (Distributed)
Apr 6 2015	Motion for divided argument filed by respondent Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General.
Apr 17 2015	Motion for divided argument filed by respondent GRANTED.
Apr 21 2015	Reply of respondent Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General filed. (Distributed)
Apr 22 2015	Reply of petitioner Noel Reyes Mata filed. (Distributed)
Apr 29 2015	Argued. For petitioner: Mark C. Fleming, Boston, Mass. For respondent in support of reversal and remand: Anthony A. Yang, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For amicus curiae in support of judgment below: William R. Peterson, Houston, Tex. (Appointed by this Court.)
Jun 15 2015	Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Kagan, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Scalia, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito, and Sotomayor, JJ., joined. Thomas, J., filed a dissenting opinion.
Jul 17 2015	JUDGMENT ISSUED.

Featured Posts

Remembering Justice Stevens: A lost link to our past – Gregory Garre

Challengers respond in dispute over funding for border wall – Amy Howe

Justice Stevens at oral argument: Often fatal; always kind – Paul Clement
Sponsored by Casetext
SCOTUStalk see all
Email Digest Sign-Up
Receive a daily email digest from Feedburner by entering your email.
Merits Case Pages and Archives

Archives

or

This Week at the Court
The justices are on their summer recess.
Major Cases
- Department of Commerce v. New York
  The secretary of the Department of Commerce did not violate the enumeration clause or the Census Act in deciding to reinstate a citizenship question on the 2020 census questionnaire, but the district court was warranted in remanding the case back to the agency where the evidence tells a story that does not match the secretary’s explanation for his decision.
- Kisor v. Wilkie
  Auer v. Robbins and Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co – under which deference is given to an agency’s reasonable reading of its own genuinely ambiguous regulations – are not overruled.
- Rucho v. Common Cause
  Partisan gerrymandering claims present political questions beyond the reach of the federal courts.
- The American Legion v. American Humanist Association
  The Bladensburg Cross does not violate the establishment clause of the First Amendment.
- Gamble v. United States
  The dual-sovereignty doctrine – under which two offenses are not the “same offence” for double jeopardy purposes if prosecuted by separate sovereigns – is upheld.
see all this term’s cases »
Recent Decisions
- Lamone v. Benisek Partisan gerrymandering claims present political questions beyond the reach of the federal courts.
- Department of Commerce v. New York The secretary of the Department of Commerce did not violate the enumeration clause or the Census Act in deciding to reinstate a citizenship question on the 2020 census questionnaire, but the district court was warranted in remanding the case back to the agency where the evidence tells a story that does not match the secretary’s explanation for his decision.
- Mitchell v. Wisconsin The Wisconsin Supreme Court’s judgment – affirming the drunk-driving convictions of Gerald Mitchell, who was administered a warrantless blood test while he was unconscious – is vacated, and the case is remanded.
- Rucho v. Common Cause Partisan gerrymandering claims present political questions beyond the reach of the federal courts.
- Kisor v. Wilkie Auer v. Robbins and Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co – under which deference is given to an agency’s reasonable reading of its own genuinely ambiguous regulations – are not overruled.
- Tennessee Wine & Spirits Retailers Association v. Thomas Tennessee’s 2-year durational-residency requirement applicable to retail liquor store license applicants violates the commerce clause and is not saved by the 21st Amendment.
- United States v. Haymond The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit’s judgment – that 18 U. S. C. §3583(k)’s last two sentences are unconstitutional and unenforceable – is vacated, and the case is remanded.
- Food Marketing Institute v. Argus Leader Media Where commercial or financial information is both customarily and actually treated as private by its owner and provided to the government under an assurance of privacy, the information is “confidential” within the meaning of 5 U. S. C. §552(b)(4), the Freedom of Information Act’s Exemption 4.
- Iancu v. Brunetti The Lanham Act prohibition on the registration of “immoral” or “scandalous” trademarks infringes the First Amendment.
- The Dutra Group v. Batterton A plaintiff may not recover punitive damages on a maritime claim of unseaworthiness.
- United States v. Davis Title 18 U. S. C. §924(c)(3)(B), which provides enhanced penalties for using a firearm during a “crime of violence,” is unconstitutionally vague.
see all this term’s cases »
Current Relists
Recent Special Features
Statistical Snapshot

Cases argued 70

Cases decided 67

Summary reversals 5

Merits cases granted to date 74

see all »
Live Blog Archives
See all
Twitter Feed

Tweets by @SCOTUSblog

Majority Opinions by Author
Voting Breakdown Argued Cases

Calendar: July 2019
Full Calendar Submit Event

July 2019

Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa

1

2

3

4
Holiday

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31
- Orders/Opinions
- Arguments
- Conferences
- Events
- Holidays
- Multiple

Su	Mo	Tu	We	Th	Fr	Sa
	1	2	3	4 Holiday	5	6
7	8	9	10	11	12	13
14	15	16	17	18	19	20
21	22	23	24	25	26	27
28	29	30	31

Download our App in the Apple Store
Videos see all

Justice Thomas at the Supreme Court Historical Society

On June 3, Justice Clarence Thomas spoke with David Rubenstein for the Supreme Court Historical Society’s annual lecture at the Supreme Court.

Peabody Award
Awarded the Peabody Award for excellence in electronic media.
Sigma Delta Chi
Awarded the Sigma Delta Chi deadline reporting award for online coverage of the Affordable Care Act decision.
National Press Club Award
Awarded the National Press Club's Breaking News Award for coverage of the Affordable Care Act decision.
Silver Gavel Award
Awarded the Silver Gavel Award by the American Bar Association for fostering the American public’s understanding of the law and the legal system.
American Gavel Award
Awarded the American Gavel Award for Distinguished Reporting About the Judiciary to recognize the highest standards of reporting about courts and the justice system.
Webby Award
Awarded the Webby Award for excellence on the internet.

Cases argued	70
Cases decided	67
Summary reversals	5
Merits cases granted to date	74

Editor's Note :

Reyes Mata v. Lynch

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Featured Posts

Remembering Justice Stevens: A lost link to our past – Gregory Garre

Challengers respond in dispute over funding for border wall – Amy Howe

Justice Stevens at oral argument: Often fatal; always kind – Paul Clement

Sponsored by Casetext

SCOTUStalk see all

Email Digest Sign-Up

Merits Case Pages and Archives

This Week at the Court

Major Cases

Recent Decisions

Current Relists

Recent Special Features

Statistical Snapshot

Live Blog Archives

Twitter Feed

Majority Opinions by Author

Voting Breakdown Argued Cases

Calendar: July 2019

July 2019

Holiday

Download our App in the Apple Store

Videos see all

Peabody Award

Sigma Delta Chi

National Press Club Award

Silver Gavel Award

American Gavel Award

Webby Award