|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|17-7505||Ala. Cir. Ct.||Oct 2, 2018||Feb 27, 2019||5-3||Kagan||OT 2018|
Holding: The Eighth Amendment may permit executing a prisoner even if he cannot remember committing his crime, but it may prohibit executing a prisoner who suffers from dementia or another disorder rather than psychotic delusions.
Judgment: Vacated and remanded, 5-3, in an opinion by Justice Kagan on February 27, 2019. Justice Alito filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justices Thomas and Gorsuch joined. Justice Kavanaugh took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jan 18 2018||Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 20, 2018)|
|Jan 19 2018||Brief of respondent State of Alabama in opposition filed.|
|Jan 22 2018||Application (17A770) for a stay of execution of sentence of death, submitted to Justice Thomas.|
|Jan 22 2018||Reply of petitioner Vernon Madison filed.|
|Jan 22 2018||Response to application from respondent State of Alabama filed.|
|Jan 25 2018||UPON CONSIDERATION of the application of counsel for the applicant, IT IS ORDERED that execution of the sentence of death is hereby stayed pending further order of Justice Thomas or of the Court.|
|Jan 25 2018||Application (17A770) referred to the Court.|
|Jan 25 2018||Application (17A770) granted by the Court. The application for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice Thomas and by him referred to the Court is granted pending the disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari. Should the petition for a writ of certiorari be denied, this stay shall terminate automatically. In the event the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the stay shall terminate upon the issuance of the mandate of this Court. Justice Thomas, Justice Alito, and Justice Gorsuch would deny the application.|
|Feb 01 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2018.|
|Feb 20 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/23/2018.|
|Feb 26 2018||Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED.|
|Mar 15 2018||Joint motion for an extension of time file the briefs on the merits.|
|Mar 27 2018||Joint motion to extend the time to file the briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including May 22, 2018. The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including July 31, 2018.|
|May 10 2018||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner Vernon Madison.|
|May 18 2018||Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, Alabama|
|May 21 2018||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Vernon Madison|
|May 22 2018||Brief of petitioner Vernon Madison filed.|
|May 29 2018||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner GRANTED.|
|May 29 2018||Brief amici curiae of American Psychological Association and American Psychiatric Association filed.|
|Jul 09 2018||SET FOR ARGUMENT On Tuesday, October 2, 2018|
|Jul 31 2018||Brief of respondent State of Alabama filed.|
|Aug 03 2018||CIRCULATED|
|Aug 07 2018||Record requested from the Circuit Court of Alabama, Mobile County.|
|Aug 07 2018||Brief amici curiae of States of Texas, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Aug 07 2018||Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Police Organizations filed. (Distributed)|
|Aug 14 2018||Record received from the Court of Criminal Appeals State of Alabama. The record is electronic.|
|Aug 16 2018||Record received from the Circuit Court of Alabama, Mobile County. The record is electronic.|
|Aug 17 2018||Record received from the Circuit Court of Alabama, Mobile County. 1 envelope.|
|Aug 24 2018||Record received from the Circuit Court of Mobile Alabama (additional material).|
|Aug 30 2018||Reply of petitioner Vernon Madison filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 02 2018||Argued. For petitioner: Bryan A. Stevenson, Montgomery, Ala. For respondent: Thomas R. Govan, Jr., Alabama Deputy Attorney General, Montgomery, Ala.|
|Dec 18 2018||Record received from the Mobile County Circuit Criminal, one box of exhibits.|
|Feb 27 2019||Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Kagan, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Ginsburg, Breyer, and Sotomayor, JJ., joined. Alito, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Thomas and Gorsuch, JJ., joined. Kavanaugh, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.|
|Apr 01 2019||MANDATE ISSUED.|
|Apr 01 2019||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
The clerk of the court just notified counsel in a juvenile sentencing case—that was sent back to a lower court this week in light of the court's decision in Jones v. Mississippi—that Justice Kagan unwittingly failed to recuse herself after participating in part of the case as SG.
It’s a quiet week, so now is a great time to listen to Judge John Owens regale @AHoweBlogger with the tale of Ashton Embry and the greatest leak in Supreme Court history.
Come for the high drama, stay for the good humor and an RBG story or two.
The biggest leak in Supreme Court history - SCOTUSblog
In a city full of anonymous sources, the Supreme Court is famously leak-proof. But a century ago, the court had ...
The US Supreme Court should overturn the Facebook’s “Oversight Board’s” “ruling” which upholds the outlawing of the 45th President of the United States from social media.
This is a big tech, corporate oligarchy without standing and it’s gone too far. Enough is enough.
The Supreme Court will hear its last case of the term today at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Here’s a summary of Terry v. United States in a TikTok minute.
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will tackle the legacy of the Reagan-era War on Drugs and Congress' attempt to reduce the punishment disparity between crack-cocaine and powder cocaine offenses.
As @ekownyankah notes, this case has a little bit of everything.
In final case the court will hear this term, profound issues of race, incarceration and the war on drugs - SCOTUSblog
Academics naturally believe that even obscure cases in their field are underappreciated; each minor tax or bankruptcy ...
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket filing in which a church argues that state COVID-related restrictions lack sufficient carveouts for religious worship. This one challenges Colorado's restrictions. It relies heavily on last month's ruling in Tandon v. Newsom.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.