Breaking News

Lund v. Datzman

Pending petition
Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
21-1179 9th Cir. TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD

Issue: Whether the Heck v. Humphrey bar on suits under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 that “would necessarily imply the invalidity” of a conviction that has not been set aside is categorically inapplicable when a convicted individual brings a Fourth Amendment claim seeking damages for an unreasonable search or seizure but not for the conviction obtained using fruits of the constitutional violation, regardless of whether the factual record reveals a particular exclusionary-rule exception or harmless-error theory that could potentially sustain the conviction’s validity despite the violation.

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
Feb 23 2022Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 28, 2022)
Mar 08 2022Waiver of right of respondent Susannah Lund to respond filed.
Mar 08 2022Letter pursuant to Rule 12.6 of respondent Susannah Lund filed.
Mar 24 2022Waiver of right of respondents City of Vacaville, Jeffrey Datzman, et al. to respond filed.
Mar 25 2022Waiver of right of respondents County of Solano, Solano County District Attorney's Office, Krishna Abrams and Ilana Shapiro to respond filed.
Apr 06 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/22/2022.
Apr 18 2022Response Requested. (Due May 18, 2022)
Apr 18 2022Letter from counsel for petitioner dated April 18, 2022 received.
May 06 2022Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 18, 2022 to May 26, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
May 09 2022Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 26, 2022, for all respondents.