|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|18-1501||9th Cir.||Mar 3, 2020||Jun 22, 2020||8-1||Sotomayor||OT 2019|
Holding: In a Securities and Exchange Commission enforcement action, a disgorgement award that does not exceed a wrongdoer’s net profits and is awarded for victims is equitable relief permissible under 15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(5).
Judgment: Vacated and remanded, 8-1, in an opinion by Justice Sotomayor on June 22, 2020. Justice Thomas filed a dissenting opinion.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Mar 22 2019||Application (18A958) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 3, 2019 to May 31, 2019, submitted to Justice Kagan.|
|Mar 22 2019||Application (18A958) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until May 31, 2019.|
|May 31 2019||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 3, 2019)|
|Jun 13 2019||Waiver of right of respondent Securities and Exchange Commission to respond filed.|
|Jun 19 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.|
|Jul 05 2019||Response Requested. (Due August 5, 2019)|
|Jul 31 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 5, 2019 to September 4, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Aug 01 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 4, 2019.|
|Sep 04 2019||Brief of respondent Securities and Exchange Commission in opposition filed.|
|Sep 18 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019.|
|Sep 18 2019||Reply of petitioners Charles C. Liu, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 08 2019||Rescheduled.|
|Oct 15 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/18/2019.|
|Oct 28 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/1/2019.|
|Nov 01 2019||Petition GRANTED.|
|Nov 19 2019||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioners, Charles C. Liu, et al.|
|Nov 26 2019||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, March 3, 2020.|
|Dec 16 2019||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)|
|Dec 16 2019||Brief of petitioners Charles C. Liu, et al. filed.|
|Dec 20 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Americans for Prosperity Foundation filed.|
|Dec 20 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Oak Management Corporation in support of neither party filed.|
|Dec 20 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Andy Altahawi filed.|
|Dec 20 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association filed.|
|Dec 20 2019||Brief amicus curiae of New England Legal Foundation filed.|
|Dec 23 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America filed.|
|Dec 23 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Washington Legal Foundation filed.|
|Dec 23 2019||Brief amici curiae of Law Professors filed.|
|Dec 23 2019||Brief amici curiae of Parker R. Hallam and Frederick A. Voight filed.|
|Dec 23 2019||Brief amicus curiae of The New Civil Liberties Alliance filed.|
|Dec 23 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Cato Institute filed.|
|Dec 23 2019||Brief amici curiae of Remedies and Restitution Scholars in support of neither party filed.|
|Jan 09 2020||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit.|
|Jan 09 2020||The record of the USCA 9th Circuit is available on PACER. Sealed record material of the USDC Central District of California received electronically.|
|Jan 15 2020||Brief of respondent Securities and Exchange Commission filed.|
|Jan 20 2020||Brief amici curiae of Former Federal Trade Commission Officials filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 20 2020||Brief amici curiae of Securities Law Professors filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 21 2020||CIRCULATED|
|Jan 21 2020||Brief amici curiae of State of Illinois, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 22 2020||Brief amici curiae of Members of Congress filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 22 2020||Brief amici curiae of Better Markets, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 22 2020||Brief amicus curiae of North American Securities Administrators Association, Inc. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 22 2020||Brief amici curiae of Former Commissioners and Staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 14 2020||Reply of petitioners Charles C. Liu, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 03 2020||Argued. For petitioners: Gregory G. Rapawy, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Malcolm L. Stewart, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.|
|Jun 22 2020||Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Sotomayor, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito, Kagan, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh, JJ., joined. Thomas, J., filed a dissenting opinion.|
|Jul 24 2020||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
NEW: SCOTUS agrees to take up two new cases. Here's the orders list. https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/030121zor_m6hn.pdf
#SCOTUS grants US v. Vaello-Madero, a challenge to exclusion of Puerto Rico residents from eligibility for Supplemental Social Security Income program, which provides benefits to poor disabled adults & children
Good morning. It’s Monday, and it’s March!
At 9:30 a.m. EST, SCOTUS will release orders from Friday’s conference.
At 10:00, the court will consider an appointments clause challenge to administrative patent judges. More from George Quillin & Jeanne Gills.
Justices to consider appointments clause challenge to administrative patent judges - SCOTUSblog
The justices continue their light load for the February argument session next week. First up is Monday’s Unite...
BREAKING: SCOTUS orders California’s Santa Clara County to allow churches to hold indoor services. Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan dissent. Here’s the short shadow docket order.
#SCOTUS grants emergency request from northern California churches to allow indoor worship services pending appeal, says result is "clearly dictated" by recent decision. Kagan dissents, joined by Breyer & Sotomayor: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/022621zr_1bo2.pdf
Just in: SCOTUS opinions expected next Thursday.
#SCOTUS website indicates that the Court will release orders from today's conference on Monday morning, March 1, at 9:30 am, with opinions again on Thursday, March 4, at 10 am. Justices will also hear oral arguments next week, including in Arizona voting dispute on Tuesday.
Apparently all the action today at #SCOTUS was not limited to opinion announcements at 10 am. Major new cert. petition filed today challenging Harvard admissions policy. https://twitter.com/GregStohr/status/1364962610177843210
NEW: Supreme Court asked to outlaw race-based college admissions. Group challenging Harvard admissions policy says it files appeal asking court to over 2003 Grutter decision.
SCOTUS rules against a college student who tried to sue police officers after they mistook him for a criminal suspect and tackled/beat him. The unanimous ruling involves a technical interpretation of the "judgment bar" under the Federal Tort Claims Act. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/19-546_7mip.pdf
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.