|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|16-327||6th Cir.||Mar 28, 2017||Jun 23, 2017||6-2||Roberts||OT 2016|
Holding: Jae Lee has demonstrated that he was prejudiced by his counsel's erroneous advice that he would not be deported as a result of pleading guilty to an aggravated felony.
Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 6-2, in an opinion by Chief Justice Roberts on June 23, 2017. Justice Thomas filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Alito joined except as to Part I. Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Sep 6 2016||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 14, 2016)|
|Oct 11 2016||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including November 14, 2016.|
|Oct 14 2016||Brief amicus curiae of The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed.|
|Oct 14 2016||Brief amici curiae of Asian Americans Advancing Justice l AAJC, and Other Immigrants' Rights Groups filed.|
|Oct 14 2016||Brief amicus curiae of Center on the Administration of Criminal Law filed.|
|Nov 9 2016||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including November 21, 2016.|
|Nov 10 2016||Letter of November 3, 2016, from counsel for petitioner received waiving the 14-day waiting period for the distribution of the petition pursuant to Rule 15.5.|
|Nov 21 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 9, 2016.|
|Nov 21 2016||Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 23 2016||Reply of petitioner Jae Lee filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 14 2016||Petition GRANTED.|
|Jan 26 2017||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including February 1, 2017.|
|Jan 26 2017||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including March 6, 2017.|
|Jan 30 2017||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioners.|
|Feb 1 2017||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)|
|Feb 1 2017||Brief of petitioner Jae Lee filed.|
|Feb 3 2017||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, March 28, 2017|
|Feb 6 2017||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 6th Circuit.|
|Feb 6 2017||Brief amici curiae of Asian Americans Advancing Justice I AAJC, et al. filed.|
|Feb 7 2017||Record received from the U.S.C.A. 6th Circuit. The record is electronic and available on PACER. One restricted document also received.|
|Feb 8 2017||Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed.|
|Feb 8 2017||Brief amicus curiae of Constitutional Accountability Center filed.|
|Feb 8 2017||Brief amicus curiae of The Cato Institute filed.|
|Feb 8 2017||Brief amicus curiae of The American Bar Association filed.|
|Feb 8 2017||Brief amici curiae of Immigrant Defense Project, et al. filed.|
|Feb 22 2017||CIRCULATED.|
|Mar 6 2017||Brief of respondent United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 13 2017||Brief amici curiae of Alabama, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 20 2017||Reply of petitioner Jae Lee filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 28 2017||Argued. For petitioner: John J. Bursch, Caledonia, Mich. For respondent: Eric J. Feigin, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.|
|Jun 23 2017||Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Roberts, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Thomas, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Alito, J., joined except as to Part I. Gorsuch, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.|
|Jul 25 2017||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
The clerk of the court just notified counsel in a juvenile sentencing case—that was sent back to a lower court this week in light of the court's decision in Jones v. Mississippi—that Justice Kagan unwittingly failed to recuse herself after participating in part of the case as SG.
It’s a quiet week, so now is a great time to listen to Judge John Owens regale @AHoweBlogger with the tale of Ashton Embry and the greatest leak in Supreme Court history.
Come for the high drama, stay for the good humor and an RBG story or two.
The biggest leak in Supreme Court history - SCOTUSblog
In a city full of anonymous sources, the Supreme Court is famously leak-proof. But a century ago, the court had ...
The US Supreme Court should overturn the Facebook’s “Oversight Board’s” “ruling” which upholds the outlawing of the 45th President of the United States from social media.
This is a big tech, corporate oligarchy without standing and it’s gone too far. Enough is enough.
The Supreme Court will hear its last case of the term today at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Here’s a summary of Terry v. United States in a TikTok minute.
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will tackle the legacy of the Reagan-era War on Drugs and Congress' attempt to reduce the punishment disparity between crack-cocaine and powder cocaine offenses.
As @ekownyankah notes, this case has a little bit of everything.
In final case the court will hear this term, profound issues of race, incarceration and the war on drugs - SCOTUSblog
Academics naturally believe that even obscure cases in their field are underappreciated; each minor tax or bankruptcy ...
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket filing in which a church argues that state COVID-related restrictions lack sufficient carveouts for religious worship. This one challenges Colorado's restrictions. It relies heavily on last month's ruling in Tandon v. Newsom.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.