|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|16-1519||5th Cir.||Apr 18, 2018||May 29, 2018||9-0||Breyer||OT 2017|
Holding: In a provision of the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act of 1996 that requires certain convicted defendants to “reimburse the victim for . . . expenses incurred during participation in the investigation or prosecution of the offense or attendance at proceedings related to the offense,” 18 U. S. C. §3663A(b)(4), the words “investigation” and “proceedings” are limited to government investigations and criminal proceedings and do not include private investigations and civil or bankruptcy proceedings.
Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Breyer on May 29, 2018.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jun 15 2017||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 21, 2017)|
|Jul 12 2017||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including August 21, 2017.|
|Aug 14 2017||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including September 20, 2017.|
|Sep 18 2017||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including October 26, 2017.|
|Oct 24 2017||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including November 30, 2017.|
|Nov 30 2017||Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.|
|Dec 08 2017||Waiver of the 14-day waiting period under Rule 15.5 filed by petitioner Sergio F.Lagos.|
|Dec 13 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2018.|
|Dec 13 2017||Reply of petitioner Sergio F.Lagos filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 08 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/12/2018.|
|Jan 12 2018||Petition GRANTED.|
|Feb 09 2018||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Sergio F.Lagos.|
|Feb 23 2018||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, April 18, 2018.|
|Feb 26 2018||Brief of petitioner Sergio F.Lagos filed.|
|Feb 26 2018||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)|
|Mar 05 2018||Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 05 2018||Brief amicus curiae of Professor Shon Hopwood filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 07 2018||CIRCULATED|
|Mar 28 2018||Brief of respondent United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 30 2018||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 5th Circuit.|
|Apr 11 2018||Reply of petitioner Sergio F.Lagos filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 18 2018||Argued. For petitioner: Daniel L. Geyser, Dallas, Tex. For respondent: Michael R. Huston, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.|
|May 29 2018||Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Breyer, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.|
|Jul 02 2018||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Four Democrats unveiled legislation today to expand the size of the Supreme Court from nine justices to 13 -- but Democratic leaders in both the House and Senate quickly threw cold water on the proposal.
Here's our report from @jamesromoser:
Bill to enlarge the Supreme Court faces dim prospects in Congress - SCOTUSblog
Four congressional Democrats introduced legislation Thursday to expand the number of seats on the Supreme Court from ...
We're so excited about our April 15 Live Webinar (w/ @HarvardACS & @HarvardFedSoc), Covering the Court, featuring an all-star lineup of panelists @jduffyrice, @katieleebarlow, @whignewtons, & @stevenmazie! _👩⚖️👩⚖️👩⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️_ Register here ➡️ https://harvard.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_k_b_9IPBQ_GV37rpsjF9kw
Senator Markey (D-Ma) is delivering remarks right now in front of the Supreme Court introducing the Judiciary Act of 2021 to expand the court to 13 justices. He’s flanked by Chairman of House Judiciary, Jerry Nadler (D-NY), and Hank Johnson (D-Ga).
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here:
Cast your vote below!
The “great chief” and the “super chief”: A final showdown in Supreme Court March Madness - SCOTUSblog
Forget Ali vs. Frazier, Celtics vs. Lakers, or Evert vs. Navratilova. It’s time for Marshall vs. Warren. After...
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.