|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|11-1447||Fla S. Ct.||Jan 15, 2013||Jun 25, 2013||5-4||Alito||OT 2012|
Holding: The government’s demand for property from a land-use permit applicant must satisfy the Nollan /Dolan requirements even when it denies the permit.
Judgment: Reversed, 5-4, in an opinion by Justice Alito on June 25, 2013. Justice Kagan filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Ginsburg, Justice Breyer, and Justice Sotomayor joined.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Mar 20 2012||Application (11A909) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 3, 2012 to June 1, 2012, submitted to Justice Thomas.|
|Mar 30 2012||Application (11A909) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until June 1, 2012.|
|May 30 2012||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 2, 2012)|
|Jun 22 2012||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including August 1, 2012.|
|Aug 1 2012||Brief of respondent St. Johns River Water Management District in opposition filed.|
|Aug 14 2012||Reply of petitioner Coy A. Koontz, Jr. filed. (Distributed)|
|Aug 15 2012||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 24, 2012.|
|Oct 1 2012||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 5, 2012.|
|Oct 5 2012||Petition GRANTED.|
|Oct 31 2012||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Tuesday, January 15, 2013.|
|Nov 6 2012||Conditional consent to the fiing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioner.|
|Nov 8 2012||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including November 21, 2012.|
|Nov 8 2012||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including December 21, 2012.|
|Nov 13 2012||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neitiher party, received from counsel for the respondent.|
|Nov 21 2012||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)|
|Nov 21 2012||Joint appendix (exhibits volume) filed.|
|Nov 21 2012||Brief of petitioner Coy A. Koontz, Jr. filed.|
|Nov 27 2012||Brief amici curiae of Association of Florida Community Developers, et al. filed.|
|Nov 28 2012||Brief amicus curiae of National Federation of Independent Business Small Business Legal Center filed.|
|Nov 28 2012||Brief amicus curiae of Hillcrest Property, LLP filed.|
|Nov 28 2012||Brief amicus curiae of American Civil Rigihts Union filed.|
|Nov 28 2012||Brief amicus curiae of Land Use Institute, Ltd. filed.|
|Nov 28 2012||Brief amici curiae of National Association of Home Builders, et al. filed.|
|Nov 28 2012||Brief amici curiae of Atlantic Legal Foundation, et al. filed.|
|Nov 28 2012||Brief amici curiae of Institute for Justice, et al. filed.|
|Nov 28 2012||Brief amicus curiae of Owners' Counsel of America filed.|
|Dec 6 2012||CIRCULATED|
|Dec 21 2012||Brief of respondent St. Johns River Water Management District filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 27 2012||Brief amici curiae of Former Members of the National Research Council Committee on Mitigating Wetland Losses filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 28 2012||Brief amici curiae of National Governors Association, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 28 2012||Brief amicus curiae of the United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 28 2012||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.|
|Dec 28 2012||Brief amici curiae of American Planning Association, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 28 2012||Brief amici curiae of California, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 28 2012||Record received from the Supreme Court of Florida. (1 box)|
|Jan 4 2013||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.|
|Jan 8 2013||Reply of petitioner Coy A. Koontz, Jr. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 15 2013||Argued. For petitioner: Paul J. Beard, II, Sacramento, Cal. For respondent: Paul R. Q. Wolfson, Washington, D. C.; and Edwin S. Kneedler, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.)|
|Jun 25 2013||Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Alito, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Scalia, Kennedy, and Thomas, JJ., joined. Kagan, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Ginsburg, Breyer, and Sotomayor, JJ., joined.|
|Jul 29 2013||MANDATE ISSUED.|
Having covered the Supreme Court for six decades, @lylden has seen a lot of changes at 1 First Street. In the latest piece in our series on the post-COVID court, Lyle examines how the court's pandemic operations could spur permanent reform.
How has COVID-19 changed the Supreme Court? And are any of those changes worth keeping? Today we launch a symposium examining those questions.
First up, a piece from @stevenmazie on how to reform oral arguments after the pandemic.
The court after COVID: A recipe for oral argument reform - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court has not yet announced whether it will return to normal operations when the 2021-22 term begins ...
NEW shadow-docket case: New York landlords ask SCOTUS for an emergency order to prevent the state from continuing to enforce its COVID-related eviction moratorium. They say the moratorium "runs roughshod" over their constitutional rights.
Filing here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A8-1.pdf
New on the shadow docket: Florida seeks an emergency order blocking CDC policies that substantially limit cruise ships from sailing.
Florida asks #SCOTUS to block, pending appeal, CDC restrictions imposed on cruise industry b/c of COVID-19 pandemic: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A5.pdf
NEW: Mississippi formally asks the Supreme Court to overturn its landmark abortion case, Roe v. Wade, in latest court filing. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1392/184703/20210722161332385_19-1392BriefForPetitioners.pdf
Biden’s SCOTUS reform commission met yesterday and discussed several reform ideas including adding justices and adopting a formal code of ethics.
Term limits emerged as a popular idea. But how to implement it — via statute or constitutional amendment?
Term limits emerge as popular proposal at latest meeting of court-reform commission - SCOTUSblog
The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court reconvened on Tuesday to hear from a new set of experts on vari...
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.