Kentner v. City of Sanibel
Petition for certiorari denied on January 12, 2015
Issue: (1) Whether traditional property rights are among those fundamental rights and liberties subject to the substantive protections of due process, per Lingle v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Nectow v. City of Cambridge, and Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.; and (2) whether a regulatory restriction on the right to use one's property “must substantially advance a legitimate state interest” to satisfy the substantive requirement of due process, per Lingle, Nectow, and Euclid.
| Date | Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding) |
|---|
| Jul 22 2014 | Application (14A103) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 6, 2014 to October 3, 2014, submitted to Justice Thomas. |
| Jul 28 2014 | Application (14A103) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until October 3, 2014. |
| Oct 3 2014 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 6, 2014) |
| Oct 21 2014 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including November 26, 2014. |
| Oct 31 2014 | Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioners. |
| Nov 3 2014 | Brief amici curiae of National Federation of Independent Business Small Business Legal Center, et al. filed. |
| Nov 6 2014 | Brief amicus curiae of Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence filed. |
| Nov 26 2014 | Brief of respondent City of Sanibel, Florida in opposition filed. |
| Dec 9 2014 | Reply of petitioners David Kentner, Susan A.Kentner, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
| Dec 10 2014 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 9, 2015. |
| Jan 12 2015 | Petition DENIED. |
