|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|13-684||8th Cir.||Nov 4, 2014||Jan 13, 2015||9-0||Scalia||OT 2014|
Holding: A borrower exercising his right to rescind under the Truth in Lending Act need only provide written notice to his lender within the three-year period; the statute does not require him to file suit within that period.
Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Scalia on January 13, 2015.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Dec 6 2013||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 6, 2014)|
|Jan 2 2014||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including February 12, 2014.|
|Jan 23 2014||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including March 14, 2014.|
|Mar 14 2014||Response to petition from respondents Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., et al. filed. VIDED.|
|Apr 2 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 18, 2014.|
|Apr 2 2014||Reply of petitioner Larry D. Jesinoski, and Cheryle Jesinoski filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 21 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 25, 2014.|
|Apr 28 2014||Petition GRANTED.|
|May 15 2014||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioners' brief on the merits is extended to and including July 15, 2014.|
|May 16 2014||The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is extended to and including September 16, 2014.|
|Jul 15 2014||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)|
|Jul 15 2014||Brief of petitioners Larry D. Jesinoski, et ux. filed.|
|Jul 15 2014||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioners.|
|Jul 15 2014||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondents.|
|Jul 22 2014||Brief amicus curiae of the United States filed.|
|Jul 22 2014||Brief amici curiae of AARP, et al. filed.|
|Jul 22 2014||Brief amici curiae of States of New York, et al. filed.|
|Aug 21 2014||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.|
|Sep 4 2014||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, November 4, 2014.|
|Sep 8 2014||Record requested from U.S.C.A. 8th Circuit.|
|Sep 15 2014||Record received from U.S.C.A. 8th Circuit. 1-Box.|
|Sep 16 2014||Brief of respondents Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., et al. filed.|
|Sep 17 2014||Brief amici curiae of American Bankers Association, et al. filed.|
|Sep 19 2014||CIRCULATED|
|Sep 23 2014||Brief amicus curiae of Professor Richard R.W. Brooks filed. (Distributed)|
|Sep 23 2014||Brief amicus curiae of Structured Finance Industry Group, Inc. filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 14 2014||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.|
|Oct 16 2014||Reply of petitioners Larry D. Jesinoski, et ux. filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 4 2014||Argued. For petitioners: David C. Frederick, Washington, D. C.; and Elaine J. Goldenberg, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondents: Seth P. Waxman, Washington, D. C.|
|Jan 13 2015||Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Scalia, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.|
|Feb 18 2015||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
|Feb 20 2015||Record returned to U.S.C.A. 8th Circuit. 1 Box.|
Wait wut.. RBG ghost-wrote the equal protection bits of Obergefell?!
And I learned this on @SCOTUSblog’s TikTok?! https://www.tiktok.com/@scotusblog/video/6922179577724931333
"This is not our first commission rodeo” says Levy. 😉
Love this write up of the @BrookingsInst's panel yesterday with @Susan_Hennessey, @danepps,@cdkang76, and @mollyereynolds.
Thanks, @SCOTUSblog and Kalvis Golde!
Spilling SCOTUS tea on TikTok today. Well, actually, @eskridgebill spilled the tea, we just tok’d about it. 🍵
The Supreme Court got rid of several cases this morning -- in one fell swoop. Read @AHoweBlogger's latest coverage of the emoluments cases, spiritual advisers at Texas executions, Texas abortion policies, COVID restrictions, and NY political corruption.
Justices vacate rulings on Trump and emoluments - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court on Monday morning released orders from the justices’ private conference on Friday, Jan. 22. The justices once again did not ac...
In this morning's orders list, SCOTUS took no action on pending cert petitions involving:
- Mississippi's near-ban on abortions after 15 weeks,
- a Trump rule banning Title X clinics from providing abortion referrals,
- the Trump administration's "public charge" immigration rule.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.