|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|19-1225||10th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2020|
Issue: Whether the Board of Regents of the University of New Mexico violated Paul Hunt’s clearly established rights as a private citizen under the First Amendment by punishing him for his off-campus, political speech.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jan 30 2020||Application (19A860) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 12, 2020 to April 10, 2020, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.|
|Jan 31 2020||Application (19A860) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until April 10, 2020.|
|Apr 10 2020||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 18, 2020)|
|Apr 21 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 18, 2020 to May 29, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Apr 22 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 29, 2020.|
|May 11 2020||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Southeastern Legal Foundation.|
|May 18 2020||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Speech First.|
|May 18 2020||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by First Amendment Scholars.|
|May 18 2020||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Joseph L. Brechner Center for Freedom of Information, et al.|
|May 28 2020||Brief of respondents Board of Regents of the University of New Mexico, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Jun 17 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.|
|Jun 18 2020||Reply of petitioner Paul Hunt filed. (Distributed)|
|Sep 28 2020||Rescheduled.|
|Oct 05 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020.|
|Oct 05 2020||Rescheduled.|
|Oct 13 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/16/2020.|
|Oct 14 2020||Rescheduled.|
|Oct 26 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/30/2020.|
|Oct 29 2020||Rescheduled.|
|Nov 02 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/6/2020.|
|Nov 04 2020||Rescheduled.|
|Nov 09 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/13/2020.|
|Nov 10 2020||Rescheduled.|
|Nov 16 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/20/2020.|
|Nov 23 2020||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Speech First GRANTED.|
|Nov 23 2020||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Southeastern Legal Foundation GRANTED.|
|Nov 23 2020||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by First Amendment Scholars GRANTED.|
|Nov 23 2020||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Joseph L. Brechner Center for Freedom of Information, et al. GRANTED.|
|Nov 23 2020||Petition DENIED.|
NEW: SCOTUS agrees to take up two new cases. Here's the orders list. https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/030121zor_m6hn.pdf
#SCOTUS grants US v. Vaello-Madero, a challenge to exclusion of Puerto Rico residents from eligibility for Supplemental Social Security Income program, which provides benefits to poor disabled adults & children
Good morning. It’s Monday, and it’s March!
At 9:30 a.m. EST, SCOTUS will release orders from Friday’s conference.
At 10:00, the court will consider an appointments clause challenge to administrative patent judges. More from George Quillin & Jeanne Gills.
Justices to consider appointments clause challenge to administrative patent judges - SCOTUSblog
The justices continue their light load for the February argument session next week. First up is Monday’s Unite...
BREAKING: SCOTUS orders California’s Santa Clara County to allow churches to hold indoor services. Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan dissent. Here’s the short shadow docket order.
#SCOTUS grants emergency request from northern California churches to allow indoor worship services pending appeal, says result is "clearly dictated" by recent decision. Kagan dissents, joined by Breyer & Sotomayor: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/022621zr_1bo2.pdf
Just in: SCOTUS opinions expected next Thursday.
#SCOTUS website indicates that the Court will release orders from today's conference on Monday morning, March 1, at 9:30 am, with opinions again on Thursday, March 4, at 10 am. Justices will also hear oral arguments next week, including in Arizona voting dispute on Tuesday.
Apparently all the action today at #SCOTUS was not limited to opinion announcements at 10 am. Major new cert. petition filed today challenging Harvard admissions policy. https://twitter.com/GregStohr/status/1364962610177843210
NEW: Supreme Court asked to outlaw race-based college admissions. Group challenging Harvard admissions policy says it files appeal asking court to over 2003 Grutter decision.
SCOTUS rules against a college student who tried to sue police officers after they mistook him for a criminal suspect and tackled/beat him. The unanimous ruling involves a technical interpretation of the "judgment bar" under the Federal Tort Claims Act. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/19-546_7mip.pdf
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.