|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|19-1225||10th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2020|
Issue: Whether the Board of Regents of the University of New Mexico violated Paul Hunt’s clearly established rights as a private citizen under the First Amendment by punishing him for his off-campus, political speech.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jan 30 2020||Application (19A860) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 12, 2020 to April 10, 2020, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.|
|Jan 31 2020||Application (19A860) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until April 10, 2020.|
|Apr 10 2020||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 18, 2020)|
|Apr 21 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 18, 2020 to May 29, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Apr 22 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 29, 2020.|
|May 11 2020||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Southeastern Legal Foundation.|
|May 18 2020||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Speech First.|
|May 18 2020||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by First Amendment Scholars.|
|May 18 2020||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Joseph L. Brechner Center for Freedom of Information, et al.|
|May 28 2020||Brief of respondents Board of Regents of the University of New Mexico, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Jun 17 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.|
|Jun 18 2020||Reply of petitioner Paul Hunt filed. (Distributed)|
|Sep 28 2020||Rescheduled.|
|Oct 05 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020.|
|Oct 05 2020||Rescheduled.|
|Oct 13 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/16/2020.|
|Oct 14 2020||Rescheduled.|
|Oct 26 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/30/2020.|
|Oct 29 2020||Rescheduled.|
|Nov 02 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/6/2020.|
|Nov 04 2020||Rescheduled.|
|Nov 09 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/13/2020.|
|Nov 10 2020||Rescheduled.|
|Nov 16 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/20/2020.|
|Nov 23 2020||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Speech First GRANTED.|
|Nov 23 2020||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Southeastern Legal Foundation GRANTED.|
|Nov 23 2020||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by First Amendment Scholars GRANTED.|
|Nov 23 2020||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Joseph L. Brechner Center for Freedom of Information, et al. GRANTED.|
|Nov 23 2020||Petition DENIED.|
Having covered the Supreme Court for six decades, @lylden has seen a lot of changes at 1 First Street. In the latest piece in our series on the post-COVID court, Lyle examines how the court's pandemic operations could spur permanent reform.
How has COVID-19 changed the Supreme Court? And are any of those changes worth keeping? Today we launch a symposium examining those questions.
First up, a piece from @stevenmazie on how to reform oral arguments after the pandemic.
The court after COVID: A recipe for oral argument reform - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court has not yet announced whether it will return to normal operations when the 2021-22 term begins ...
NEW shadow-docket case: New York landlords ask SCOTUS for an emergency order to prevent the state from continuing to enforce its COVID-related eviction moratorium. They say the moratorium "runs roughshod" over their constitutional rights.
Filing here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A8-1.pdf
New on the shadow docket: Florida seeks an emergency order blocking CDC policies that substantially limit cruise ships from sailing.
Florida asks #SCOTUS to block, pending appeal, CDC restrictions imposed on cruise industry b/c of COVID-19 pandemic: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A5.pdf
NEW: Mississippi formally asks the Supreme Court to overturn its landmark abortion case, Roe v. Wade, in latest court filing. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1392/184703/20210722161332385_19-1392BriefForPetitioners.pdf
Biden’s SCOTUS reform commission met yesterday and discussed several reform ideas including adding justices and adopting a formal code of ethics.
Term limits emerged as a popular idea. But how to implement it — via statute or constitutional amendment?
Term limits emerge as popular proposal at latest meeting of court-reform commission - SCOTUSblog
The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court reconvened on Tuesday to hear from a new set of experts on vari...