Herrera v. Oregon

Petition for certiorari denied on January 10, 2010

Docket No.	Op. Below	Argument	Opinion	Vote	Author	Term
10-344	Court of Appeals of Oregon, opinion begins on pg. 50	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	OT 2009

Issue: Whether the Sixth Amendment, as incorporated against the states by the Fourteenth Amendment, requires a unanimous jury verdict to convict a person of a crime.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Petition of the day (Conor McEvily, October 5, 2010)

Briefs and Documents

Opinion Below (Court of Appeals of Oregon, opinion begins on pg. 50)
Petition for certiorari
Brief in opposition
Amicus brief for Sheri S. Diamond, et al.
Amicus brief for Professor Jeffrey B. Abramson
Amicus brief for Oregon Criminal-Law and Criminal-Procedure Professors
Amicus brief for the Federal Public Defender of the District of Oregon
Amicus brief for Professor Kate Stith
Amicus brief for the Louisiana Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, et al.
Petitioner's reply

Breaking News

Herrera v. Oregon

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Briefs and Documents

Certiorari-stage documents

Supreme Court to hear Trump’s bid for criminal immunity

Ghost guns, six-person juries, and discretionary visa decisions

Justices divided over Jan. 6 participant’s call to throw out obstruction charge

Justices limit securities liability for omission of material facts