|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
Apr 20, 2021
Issue: Whether, when applying plain-error review based on an intervening United States Supreme Court decision, Rehaif v. United States, a circuit court of appeals may review matters outside the trial record to determine whether the error affected a defendant’s substantial rights or impacted the fairness, integrity or public reputation of the trial.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jun 08 2020||Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 15, 2020)|
|Jun 17 2020||Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.|
|Jun 25 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.|
|Aug 10 2020||Response Requested. (Due September 9, 2020)|
|Aug 28 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 9, 2020 to October 9, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Aug 31 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 9, 2020.|
|Oct 09 2020||Brief of respondent United States of America filed.|
|Dec 03 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.|
|Dec 04 2020||Rescheduled.|
|Dec 23 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.|
|Jan 06 2021||Reply of petitioner Gregory Greer filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 08 2021||Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED.|
|Feb 22 2021||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)|
|Feb 22 2021||Brief of petitioner Gregory Greer filed.|
|Feb 22 2021||Motion file Volume II of the joint appendix under seal filed by petitioner Gregory Greer.|
|Mar 01 2021||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Gregory Greer|
|Mar 01 2021||Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed.|
|Mar 12 2021||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, April 20, 2021.|
|Mar 15 2021||Record requested.|
|Mar 15 2021||The record from the U.S.C.A. 11th Circuit is electronic and located on Pacer.|
|Mar 19 2021||Record from the U.S.D.C. Middle District of Florida Jacksonville Division has been electronically received and filed.|
|Mar 24 2021||Brief of respondent United States of America filed.|
|Mar 29 2021||Motion of petitioner for leave to file Volume II of the joint appendix under seal GRANTED.|
|Mar 30 2021||CIRCULATED|
|Apr 09 2021||Reply of petitioner Gregory Greer filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 20 2021||Argued. For petitioner: M. Allison Guagliardo, Assistant Federal Defender, Tampa, Fla. For respondent: Benjamin W. Snyder, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C..|
Today at the court:
A nuts-and-bolts question of civil procedure. After an appeal is decided, do courts have discretion to limit the administrative “costs” that the prevailing party can recover from the losing party?
Argument begins at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Justices to consider awards of costs of appellate litigation - SCOTUSblog
Wednesday’s argument in City of San Antonio v. Hotels.com brings the justices a basic nuts-and-bolts question of...
In 2019, the Supreme Court limited the scope of a federal law that bans people convicted of felonies from having a gun. Up this morning at the court: back-to-back cases that will decide how many felon-in-possession convictions will need new trials or pleas under that 2019 ruling.
NEW: SCOTUS adds one new case to its docket for next term: Hemphill v. New York, a criminal-procedure case about the interaction between hearsay rules and the right of defendants to confront witnesses against them. Still no action on major petitions involving guns and abortion.
The court will release orders at 9:30 a.m. EDT followed by oral argument in two cases.
First, whether Alaska Native regional and village corporations are “Indian Tribes” for purposes of CARES Act Covid-related relief.
By @StanfordLaw’s Gregory Ablavsky.
Are Alaska Native corporations Indian tribes? A multimillion-dollar question - SCOTUSblog
Are Alaska Native corporations — special corporations that Congress created in 1971 when it resolved Native claims ...
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.