|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|11-1059||3d Cir.||Dec 3, 2012||Apr 16, 2013||5-4||Thomas||OT 2012|
Holding: Because respondent had no personal interest in representing putative, unnamed claimants, nor any other continuing interest that would preserve her suit from mootness, her suit was appropriately dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.
Judgment: Reversed, 5-4, in an opinion by Justice Thomas on April 16, 2013. Justice Kagan filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Ginsburg, Justice Breyer, and Justice Sotomayor joined.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Dec 9 2011||Application (11A570) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 18, 2012 to February 17, 2012, submitted to Justice Alito.|
|Dec 13 2011||Application (11A570) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until February 17, 2012.|
|Feb 17 2012||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 28, 2012)|
|Mar 12 2012||Waiver of right of respondent Laura Symczyk to respond filed.|
|Mar 21 2012||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 13, 2012.|
|Mar 21 2012||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by DRI - The Voice of the Defense Bar. (Distributed)|
|Mar 21 2012||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. (Distributed)|
|Mar 28 2012||Response Requested . (Due April 27, 2012)|
|Apr 24 2012||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including May 25, 2012.|
|May 25 2012||Brief of respondent Laura Symczyk in opposition filed.|
|Jun 5 2012||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 21, 2012.|
|Jun 5 2012||Reply of petitioner Genesis HealthCare Corporation, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jun 25 2012||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. GRANTED.|
|Jun 25 2012||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by DRI - The Voice of the Defense Bar GRANTED.|
|Jun 25 2012||Petition GRANTED.|
|Jul 17 2012||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including August 30, 2012.|
|Jul 17 2012||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including October 19, 2012.|
|Jul 24 2012||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioners.|
|Aug 30 2012||Brief of petitioners Genesis HealthCare Corporation, et al. filed.|
|Aug 30 2012||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of Costs)|
|Sep 4 2012||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or neither party, received from counsel for the respondent.|
|Sep 6 2012||Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed.|
|Sep 6 2012||Brief amicus curiae of ACA International filed.|
|Sep 6 2012||Brief amicus curiae of DRI - The Voice of the Defense Bar filed.|
|Sep 6 2012||Brief amicus curiae of Equal Employment Advisory Council filed.|
|Sep 14 2012||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Monday, December 3, 2012.|
|Sep 14 2012||CIRCULATED|
|Oct 1 2012||Record from U.S.D.C. for Eastern District of Pennsylvania is electronic.|
|Oct 1 2012||Record from U.S.C.A. for 3rd Circuit is electronic.|
|Oct 17 2012||Brief amicus curiae of the United States supporting affirmance filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 19 2012||Brief of respondent Laura Symczyk filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 26 2012||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.|
|Oct 26 2012||Brief amici curiae of Scholars Stephen B. Burbank, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 26 2012||Brief amicus curiae of American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 26 2012||Brief amici curiae of The Impact Fund, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 26 2012||Brief amici curiae of Service Employees International Union, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 26 2012||Brief amici curiae of National Employment Lawyers Association, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 13 2012||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.|
|Nov 16 2012||Reply of petitioners Genesis HealthCare Corporation, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 3 2012||Argued. For petitioners: Ronald Mann, New York, N. Y. For respondent: Neal Kumar Katyal, Washington, D. C.: and Anthony A. Yang, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.)|
|Apr 16 2013||Judgment REVERSED. Thomas, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Scalia, Kennedy, and Alito, JJ., joined. Kagan, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Ginsburg, Breyer, and Sotomayor, JJ., joined.|
|May 20 2013||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
SCOTUS will hear oral argument at 10:00 a.m. EST about when claimants must raise claims in the administrative process – “exhausting” their administrative remedies. Read more from Ronald Mann.
It might sound exhausting! But we claim it might be fun.
Justices to weigh issue exhaustion for Social Security claimants - SCOTUSblog
Wednesday’s argument in Carr v. Saul involves a surprisingly basic question of administrative law: when claimants ...
Who you calling “shrinking”? — the shadow docket
With #SCOTUS’s shrinking docket, we have to wonder if @SCOTUSblog will become a bi-monthly publication.
The Supreme Court will take up voting rights this morning.
Oral argument begins at 10:00 a.m. EST.
Justices to consider whether Arizona’s voting rules discriminate against minorities - SCOTUSblog
The 2020 elections may be over, but the Supreme Court will soon hear oral argument in a pair of voting-rights ...
Tomorrow morning the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a pair of voting rights cases involving Section 2 of the 1965 Voting Rights Act, which prohibits policies or laws that result in racial discrimination in voting.
Missed the morning orders? @AHoweBlogger's got you covered. Read about the new grants including a review of Puerto Rico’s eligibility for a federal benefits program. Plus, she's got an overview of several high-profile petitions still under consideration.
Court will review Puerto Rico’s eligibility for federal benefits program - SCOTUSblog
The court on Monday morning issued orders from the justices’ private conference on Friday, Feb. 26. The justic...
NEW: SCOTUS agrees to take up two new cases. Here's the orders list. https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/030121zor_m6hn.pdf
#SCOTUS grants US v. Vaello-Madero, a challenge to exclusion of Puerto Rico residents from eligibility for Supplemental Social Security Income program, which provides benefits to poor disabled adults & children
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.