|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|11-817||Fla. S. Ct.||Oct 31, 2012||Feb 19, 2013||9-0||Kagan||OT 2012|
Holding: When, subject to challenge by the defendant, the police provide evidence of a drug-sniffing dog’s satisfactory performance in a certification or training program, the dog’s alert can provide probable cause to search a vehicle.
Judgment: Reversed, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Kagan on February 19, 2013.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Dec 21 2011||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 30, 2012)|
|Jan 12 2012||Waiver of right of respondent Clayton Harris to respond filed.|
|Jan 24 2012||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by National Police Canine Association, et al.|
|Jan 25 2012||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 17, 2012.|
|Jan 30 2012||Brief amicus curiae of Commonwealth of Virginia, et al. filed.|
|Jan 31 2012||Response Requested . (Due March 1, 2012)|
|Feb 15 2012||Brief of respondent Clayton Harris in opposition filed.|
|Feb 15 2012||Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent.|
|Feb 29 2012||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 16, 2012.|
|Mar 19 2012||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 23, 2012.|
|Mar 26 2012||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by National Police Canine Association, et al. GRANTED.|
|Mar 26 2012||Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.|
|Mar 26 2012||Petition GRANTED.|
|May 9 2012||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including June 11, 2012.|
|Jun 8 2012||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is further extended to and including June 25, 2012.|
|Jun 25 2012||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed.)|
|Jun 25 2012||Brief of petitioner Florida filed.|
|Jun 27 2012||Brief amici curiae of National Police Canine Association, et al. filed.|
|Jun 29 2012||Brief amici curiae of Commonwealth of Virginia, et al. filed.|
|Jul 2 2012||Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.|
|Jul 11 2012||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including August 24, 2012.|
|Jul 23 2012||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Wednesday, October 31, 2012|
|Aug 2 2012||CIRCULATED|
|Aug 22 2012||Record received from Supreme Court of Florida. (1 envelope)|
|Aug 24 2012||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.|
|Aug 24 2012||Brief of respondent Clayton Harris filed. (Distributed)|
|Aug 30 2012||Brief amicus curiae of Institute for Justice filed. (Distributed)|
|Aug 30 2012||Brief amicus curiae of The Rutherford Institute filed. (Distributed)|
|Aug 31 2012||Brief amicus curiae of EPIC filed. (Distributed)|
|Aug 31 2012||Brief amici curiae of Fourth Amendment Scholars filed. (Distributed)|
|Aug 31 2012||Brief amici curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Sep 24 2012||Reply of petitioner Florida filed. (Distributed)|
|Sep 25 2012||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.|
|Oct 31 2012||Argued. For petitioner: Gregory G. Garre, Washington, D. C.; and Joseph R. Palmore, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondent: Glen P. Gifford, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, Fla.|
|Feb 19 2013||Judgment REVERSED. Kagan, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.|
|Mar 25 2013||MANDATE ISSUED.|
|Apr 23 2013||Record returned to Supreme Court of Florida.|
In yet another Friday night shadow docket order, a divided Supreme Court sides with challengers to California’s COVID-related restrictions. Brief per curiam opinion and dissent from Justice Kagan: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20a151_4g15.pdf
By vote of 5-4, #SCOTUS blocks California's COVID-related restrictions on in-home prayer meetings and worship. Opinion & Kagan's dissent are here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20a151_4g15.pdf
President Biden will sign an executive order authorizing a commission to study Supreme Court reform. The commission will review “the length of service and turnover of justices on the court; the membership and size of the court” among other topics.
President Biden to Sign Executive Order Creating the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States | The White House
President Biden will today issue an executive order forming the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States, comprised of a
The Supreme Court will hear April and May oral arguments remotely but with a live audio feed.
#SCOTUS confirms that "[i]n keeping with public health guidance in response to COVID-19," it will hear oral arguments in April and on May 4 remotely, as it has for the other argument sessions this term. Press release here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Media-Advisory-Teleconference-Arguments.pdf
In a Monday evening shadow-docket filing, Tennessee asks the Supreme Court to reinstate a state law that imposes a 48-hour waiting period for patients to abortions. A federal judge struck down the waiting period as unconstitutional. @AHoweBlogger explains:
Tennessee asks court to restore waiting period for abortions - SCOTUSblog
Tennessee filed an emergency request with the Supreme Court on Monday, asking the justices for permission to enforce...
BREAKING: In major copyright battle between tech giants, SCOTUS sides w/ Google over Oracle, finding that Google didnt commit copyright infringement when it reused lines of code in its Android operating system. The code came from Oracle's JAVA SE platform. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/18-956_d18f.pdf
NEW: The Supreme Court agrees to take up one new case, Brown v. Davenport. It's a technical but important question about the standard for federal courts reviewing habeas claims to assess whether constitutional violations were "harmless error." https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/040521zor_3204.pdf
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.