|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|19-825||7th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2020|
Issue: Whether Section 13(b) of the Federal Trade Commission Act authorizes district courts to enter an injunction that orders the return of unlawfully obtained funds.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Nov 08 2019||Application (19A517) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 19, 2019 to December 19, 2019, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.|
|Nov 08 2019||Application (19A517) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until December 19, 2019.|
|Dec 19 2019||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 30, 2020)|
|Jan 20 2020||Conditional Cross Petition for a Writ of Certiorari of Credit Bureau Center, LLC, et al. not accepted for filing. (January 22, 2020)|
|Jan 30 2020||Brief amici curiae of State of Illinois et al. filed.|
|Apr 01 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2020.|
|Apr 02 2020||Response Requested. (Due May 4, 2020)|
|Apr 14 2020||Brief of respondents Credit Bureau Center, LLC, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Apr 28 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.|
|Apr 28 2020||Reply of petitioners Federal Trade Commission filed. (Distributed)|
|Jun 22 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/25/2020.|
|Jun 22 2020||Supplemental brief of respondents Credit Bureau Center, LLC, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jun 29 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 7/1/2020.|
|Jul 08 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 7/8/2020.|
|Jul 09 2020||Petition GRANTED. The petition for a writ of certiorari in No. 19-508 is granted. The cases are consolidated, and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument. VIDED.|
|Jul 09 2020||Because the Court has consolidated these cases for briefing and oral argument, future filings and activity in the cases will now be reflected on the docket of No. 19-508. Subsequent filings in these cases must therefore be submitted through the electronic filing system in No. 19-508. Each document submitted in connection with one or more of these cases must include on its cover the case number and caption for each case in which the filing is intended to be submitted. Where a filing is submitted in fewer than all of the cases, the docket entry will reflect the case number(s) in which the filing is submitted; a document filed in all of the consolidated cases will be noted as “VIDED.”|
|Nov 09 2020||This case is no longer consolidated with No. 19-508, AMG Capital Management, LLC v. Federal Trade Commission. The July 9, 2020 order granting the petition for a writ of certiorari in this case is vacated. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration of this order.|
NEW: SCOTUS adds one new case to its docket for next term: Hemphill v. New York, a criminal-procedure case about the interaction between hearsay rules and the right of defendants to confront witnesses against them. Still no action on major petitions involving guns and abortion.
The court will release orders at 9:30 a.m. EDT followed by oral argument in two cases.
First, whether Alaska Native regional and village corporations are “Indian Tribes” for purposes of CARES Act Covid-related relief.
By @StanfordLaw’s Gregory Ablavsky.
Are Alaska Native corporations Indian tribes? A multimillion-dollar question - SCOTUSblog
Are Alaska Native corporations — special corporations that Congress created in 1971 when it resolved Native claims ...
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Four Democrats unveiled legislation today to expand the size of the Supreme Court from nine justices to 13 -- but Democratic leaders in both the House and Senate quickly threw cold water on the proposal.
Here's our report from @jamesromoser:
Bill to enlarge the Supreme Court faces dim prospects in Congress - SCOTUSblog
Four congressional Democrats introduced legislation Thursday to expand the number of seats on the Supreme Court from ...
We're so excited about our April 15 Live Webinar (w/ @HarvardACS & @HarvardFedSoc), Covering the Court, featuring an all-star lineup of panelists @jduffyrice, @katieleebarlow, @whignewtons, & @stevenmazie! _👩⚖️👩⚖️👩⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️_ Register here ➡️ https://harvard.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_k_b_9IPBQ_GV37rpsjF9kw
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.