Fast Auto Loans v. Maldonado
Petition for certiorari denied on December 13, 2021Linked with:
Issue: Whether California’s McGill rule, under which agreements for individualized arbitration are invalidated when a plaintiff seeks public injunctive relief, is preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act.
| Date | Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding) |
|---|
| Jul 07 2021 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 9, 2021) |
| Aug 04 2021 | Waiver of right of respondent Joe Maldonado, et al. to respond filed. |
| Aug 11 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021. |
| Aug 25 2021 | Response Requested. (Due September 24, 2021) |
| Sep 16 2021 | Supplemental brief of petitioner Fast Auto Loans, Inc. filed. |
| Sep 19 2021 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 24, 2021 to October 25, 2021, submitted to The Clerk. |
| Sep 21 2021 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 25, 2021. |
| Oct 19 2021 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 25, 2021 to November 8, 2021, submitted to The Clerk. |
| Oct 20 2021 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including November 8, 2021. |
| Nov 08 2021 | Brief of respondents Joe Maldonado, et al. in opposition filed. |
| Nov 18 2021 | Reply of petitioner Fast Auto Loans, Inc. filed. |
| Nov 23 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/10/2021. |
| Dec 13 2021 | Petition DENIED. |
