|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|16-1362||9th Cir.||Jan 17, 2018||Apr 2, 2018||5-4||Thomas||OT 2017|
Holding: Because service advisors at car dealerships are “salesm[e]n . . . primarily engaged in . . . servicing automobiles,” 29 U. S. C. §213(b)(10)(A), they are exempt from the Fair Labor Standards Act’s overtime-pay requirement.
Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 5-4, in an opinion by Justice Thomas on April 2, 2018. Justice Ginsburg filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justices Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan joined.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Mar 30 2017||Application (16A940) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 9, 2017 to May 10, 2017, submitted to Justice Kennedy.|
|Apr 03 2017||Application (16A940) granted by Justice Kennedy extending the time to file until May 10, 2017.|
|May 10 2017||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 12, 2017)|
|May 19 2017||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including July 24, 2017.|
|Jun 12 2017||Brief amici curiae of National Automobile Dealers Association, et al. filed.|
|Jul 21 2017||Brief of respondents Hector Navarro, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Aug 09 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/25/2017.|
|Aug 09 2017||Reply of petitioner Encino Motorcars, LLC filed. (Distributed)|
|Sep 28 2017||Petition GRANTED.|
|Oct 26 2017||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Encino Motorcars, LLC|
|Oct 26 2017||Blanket Consent filed by Respondents, Hector Navarro, et al.|
|Nov 01 2017||Joint appendix filed.|
|Nov 01 2017||Brief of petitioner Encino Motorcars, LLC filed.|
|Nov 08 2017||Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed.|
|Nov 08 2017||Brief amici curiae of National Automobile Dealers Association and State Automobile Dealers Associations for Alaska, et al. filed.|
|Nov 08 2017||The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is extended to and including December 8, 2017.|
|Nov 17 2017||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Wednesday, January 17, 2018|
|Nov 22 2017||CIRCULATED.|
|Dec 07 2017||Brief amicus curiae of National Employment Lawyers Association filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 07 2017||Brief amicus curiae of International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, AFL-CIO filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 08 2017||Brief amici curiae of Law Professors James Brudney, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 08 2017||Brief of respondents Hector Navarro, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 15 2017||Brief amici curiae of U.S. SENATORS PATTY MURRAY, SHERROD BROWN, AND JACK REED filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 18 2017||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit.|
|Dec 19 2017||The record for the U.S.C.A. is electronic and located on PACER.|
|Jan 08 2018||Reply of petitioner Encino Motorcars, LLC filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 17 2018||Argued. For petitioner: Paul D. Clement, Washington, D. C. For respondents: James A. Feldman, Philadelphia, Pa.|
|Apr 02 2018||Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Thomas, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Kennedy, Alito, and Gorsuch, JJ., joined. Ginsburg, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ. joined.|
|May 04 2018||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Four Democrats unveiled legislation today to expand the size of the Supreme Court from nine justices to 13 -- but Democratic leaders in both the House and Senate quickly threw cold water on the proposal.
Here's our report from @jamesromoser:
Bill to enlarge the Supreme Court faces dim prospects in Congress - SCOTUSblog
Four congressional Democrats introduced legislation Thursday to expand the number of seats on the Supreme Court from ...
We're so excited about our April 15 Live Webinar (w/ @HarvardACS & @HarvardFedSoc), Covering the Court, featuring an all-star lineup of panelists @jduffyrice, @katieleebarlow, @whignewtons, & @stevenmazie! _👩⚖️👩⚖️👩⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️_ Register here ➡️ https://harvard.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_k_b_9IPBQ_GV37rpsjF9kw
Senator Markey (D-Ma) is delivering remarks right now in front of the Supreme Court introducing the Judiciary Act of 2021 to expand the court to 13 justices. He’s flanked by Chairman of House Judiciary, Jerry Nadler (D-NY), and Hank Johnson (D-Ga).
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here:
Cast your vote below!
The “great chief” and the “super chief”: A final showdown in Supreme Court March Madness - SCOTUSblog
Forget Ali vs. Frazier, Celtics vs. Lakers, or Evert vs. Navratilova. It’s time for Marshall vs. Warren. After...
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.