|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|16-1362||9th Cir.||Jan 17, 2018||Apr 2, 2018||5-4||Thomas||OT 2017|
Holding: Because service advisors at car dealerships are “salesm[e]n . . . primarily engaged in . . . servicing automobiles,” 29 U. S. C. §213(b)(10)(A), they are exempt from the Fair Labor Standards Act’s overtime-pay requirement.
Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 5-4, in an opinion by Justice Thomas on April 2, 2018. Justice Ginsburg filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justices Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan joined.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Mar 30 2017||Application (16A940) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 9, 2017 to May 10, 2017, submitted to Justice Kennedy.|
|Apr 03 2017||Application (16A940) granted by Justice Kennedy extending the time to file until May 10, 2017.|
|May 10 2017||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 12, 2017)|
|May 19 2017||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including July 24, 2017.|
|Jun 12 2017||Brief amici curiae of National Automobile Dealers Association, et al. filed.|
|Jul 21 2017||Brief of respondents Hector Navarro, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Aug 09 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/25/2017.|
|Aug 09 2017||Reply of petitioner Encino Motorcars, LLC filed. (Distributed)|
|Sep 28 2017||Petition GRANTED.|
|Oct 26 2017||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Encino Motorcars, LLC|
|Oct 26 2017||Blanket Consent filed by Respondents, Hector Navarro, et al.|
|Nov 01 2017||Joint appendix filed.|
|Nov 01 2017||Brief of petitioner Encino Motorcars, LLC filed.|
|Nov 08 2017||Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed.|
|Nov 08 2017||Brief amici curiae of National Automobile Dealers Association and State Automobile Dealers Associations for Alaska, et al. filed.|
|Nov 08 2017||The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is extended to and including December 8, 2017.|
|Nov 17 2017||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Wednesday, January 17, 2018|
|Nov 22 2017||CIRCULATED.|
|Dec 07 2017||Brief amicus curiae of National Employment Lawyers Association filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 07 2017||Brief amicus curiae of International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, AFL-CIO filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 08 2017||Brief amici curiae of Law Professors James Brudney, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 08 2017||Brief of respondents Hector Navarro, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 15 2017||Brief amici curiae of U.S. SENATORS PATTY MURRAY, SHERROD BROWN, AND JACK REED filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 18 2017||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit.|
|Dec 19 2017||The record for the U.S.C.A. is electronic and located on PACER.|
|Jan 08 2018||Reply of petitioner Encino Motorcars, LLC filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 17 2018||Argued. For petitioner: Paul D. Clement, Washington, D. C. For respondents: James A. Feldman, Philadelphia, Pa.|
|Apr 02 2018||Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Thomas, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Kennedy, Alito, and Gorsuch, JJ., joined. Ginsburg, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ. joined.|
|May 04 2018||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
The Supreme Court sides with Sen. Ted Cruz in his First Amendment challenge to a federal campaign-finance law that limits how and when candidates can recoup loans that they make to their own campaigns. The vote is 6-3 along ideological lines.
In an immigration case, SCOTUS rules 5-4 that federal courts do NOT have jurisdiction to review certain executive-branch factual findings that determine whether non-citizens are eligible for "adjustment of status." Those findings can dictate whether a person is deported.
SCOTUS agrees to take up two new cases: Jones v. Hendrix (a habeas corpus case) and SEC v. Cochran (a case about the power of district courts to hear challenges to the constitutionality of the SEC's administrative law proceedings). Full order list here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/051622zor_hgcj.pdf
We're live now on SCOTUSblog's homepage or at https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/05/announcement-of-orders-and-opinions-for-monday-may-16/
Today at SCOTUS: The court will issue one or more opinions in argued cases at 10 a.m. EDT. But first, orders on pending petitions at 9:30. We'll fire up our live blog at 9:25 to break it all down and answer your questions. Grab some ☕️ and come join us: https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/05/announcement-of-orders-and-opinions-for-monday-may-16/
Today at SCOTUS: The court will issue one or more opinions in argued cases at 10 a.m. EDT. But first, orders on pending petitions at 9:30. We'll fire up our live blog at 9:25 to break it all down and answer your questions. Grab some ☕️ and come join us:
Announcement of orders and opinions for Monday, May 16 - SCOTUSblog
On Monday, May 16, we will be live blogging as the court releases orders from the May 12 conference and opinio...
We can announce, however, that we'll be liveblogging the release of orders from today's conference AND opinions, starting at around 9:25 @SCOTUSblog. Please join us to discuss the leak, pending opinions, and whatever other SCOTUS-related issues are on your mind. https://twitter.com/AHoweBlogger/status/1524788054434660353
#SCOTUS will release opinions from argued cases at 10 am on Monday. The Court does not announce in advance how many opinions it will release or which ones.