Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
16-1178 | 2d Cir. | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | OT 2016 |
Issues: (1) Whether federal courts have jurisdiction to entertain pre-emptive collateral attacks on money judgments issued by foreign courts; and (2) whether the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act authorizes federal courts to issue injunctive relief to private parties.
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
Jan 11 2017 | Application (16A686) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 25, 2017 to March 26, 2017, submitted to Justice Ginsburg. |
Jan 12 2017 | Application (16A686) granted by Justice Ginsburg extending the time to file until March 27, 2017. |
Mar 27 2017 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 1, 2017) |
Mar 27 2017 | Appendix of Steven Donziger, et al. filed. |
Apr 21 2017 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including May 15, 2017. |
May 1 2017 | Brief amicus curiae of The Republic of Ecuador filed. |
May 1 2017 | Brief amici curiae of Amazon Watch and Rainforest Action Network filed. |
May 1 2017 | Brief amici curiae of International Law Professors filed. |
May 1 2017 | Brief amici curiae of The Earth and 14 other non-profit Organizations filed. |
May 15 2017 | Brief of respondent Chevron Corporation in opposition filed. |
May 30 2017 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 15, 2017. |
May 31 2017 | Reply of petitioners Steven Donziger, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
Jun 19 2017 | Petition DENIED. |
At 10:00 a.m. EST, SCOTUS will hear argument on whether, when police are pursuing someone for a misdemeanor, that is always an “exigent circumstance” that will allow the officer to follow the suspect into a house without a warrant. More from @AHoweBlogger
Justices to consider whether “hot pursuit” justifies entering the home without a warrant - SCOTUSblog
An old English maxim instructs that a man’s home is his castle – a refuge from the outside world. On W...
www.scotusblog.com
At 10:00 a.m. EST, the court will hear argument on whether a federal appellate court can consider an asylum seeker’s testimony as credible in its own review when immigration courts fail to make an explicit credibility determination. More from Eunice Lee:
Court to assess when to treat asylum seekers’ testimony as credible - SCOTUSblog
In asylum cases before the immigration and federal courts, responsibility for making credibility determinations rests wi...
www.scotusblog.com
Here’s the story from @jamesromoser on the Biden administration’s latest effort to reduce the Supreme Court’s already whittled-down docket. https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/02/federal-government-asks-court-to-scrap-challenge-to-medicaid-work-requirements/
New: The federal gov't wants SCOTUS to nix the upcoming case on Trump-era Medicaid work-requirement approvals (currently scheduled for oral argument on 3/29). The Biden administration -- in the process of rescinding the policy -- tells SCOTUS it no longer needs to hear the case.
New: The federal gov't wants SCOTUS to nix the upcoming case on Trump-era Medicaid work-requirement approvals (currently scheduled for oral argument on 3/29). The Biden administration -- in the process of rescinding the policy -- tells SCOTUS it no longer needs to hear the case.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.