|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|13-719||10th Cir.||Oct 7, 2014||Dec 15, 2014||5-4||Ginsburg||OT 2014|
Holding: A defendant’s notice of removal of a case from state to federal court need include only a plausible allegation that the amount in controversy exceeds the jurisdictional threshold; it does not need to contain evidentiary submissions.
Judgment: Reversed, 5-4, in an opinion by Justice Ginsburg on December 15, 2014. Justice Scalia filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Kennedy and Justice Kagan joined, and which Justice Thomas joined as to all but the last sentence. Justice Thomas also filed a dissenting opinion.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Dec 13 2013||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 16, 2014)|
|Dec 19 2013||Waiver of right of respondent Brandon W. Owens to respond filed.|
|Jan 8 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 24, 2014.|
|Jan 8 2014||Response Requested . (Due February 7, 2014)|
|Jan 27 2014||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including February 21, 2014.|
|Feb 7 2014||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America.|
|Feb 21 2014||Brief of respondent Brandon W. Owens in opposition filed.|
|Mar 4 2014||Reply of petitioners Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Company, LLC, et al. filed.|
|Mar 12 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 28, 2014.|
|Mar 31 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 4, 2014.|
|Apr 7 2014||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America GRANTED.|
|Apr 7 2014||Petition GRANTED.|
|May 15 2014||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs in support of petitioners received from counsel for petitioners.|
|May 15 2014||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondent.|
|May 21 2014||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Company, LLC, et al. v. Brandon W. Owens.|
|May 22 2014||Brief of petitioners Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Company, LLC, et al. filed.|
|May 29 2014||Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America filed.|
|May 29 2014||Brief amici curiae of Washington Legal Foundation, et al. filed.|
|May 29 2014||Brief amicus curiae of DRI - The Voice of the Defense Bar filed.|
|Jun 2 2014||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioners GRANTED.|
|Jun 6 2014||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including July 23, 2014.|
|Jul 9 2014||Record requested from U.S.C.A. 10th Circuit.|
|Jul 15 2014||Record received from U.S.C.A. 10th Circuit is electronic and available on PACER.|
|Jul 16 2014||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Tuesday, October 7, 2014|
|Jul 23 2014||Brief of respondent Brandon W. Owens filed.|
|Jul 29 2014||Brief amicus curiae of Public Citizen, Inc. filed.|
|Aug 7 2014||CIRCULATED.|
|Aug 22 2014||Reply of petitioners Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Company, LLC, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 7 2014||Argued. For petitioners: Nowell D. Berreth, Atlanta, Ga. For respondent: Rex A. Sharp, Prairie Village, Kan.|
|Dec 15 2014||Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Ginsburg, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Breyer, Alito, and Sotomayor, JJ., joined. Scalia, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Kennedy and Kagan, JJ., joined, and in which Thomas, J., joined as to all but the final sentence. Thomas, J., filed a dissenting opinion.|
|Jan 16 2015||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
NEW: SCOTUS adds one new case to its docket for next term: Hemphill v. New York, a criminal-procedure case about the interaction between hearsay rules and the right of defendants to confront witnesses against them. Still no action on major petitions involving guns and abortion.
The court will release orders at 9:30 a.m. EDT followed by oral argument in two cases.
First, whether Alaska Native regional and village corporations are “Indian Tribes” for purposes of CARES Act Covid-related relief.
By @StanfordLaw’s Gregory Ablavsky.
Are Alaska Native corporations Indian tribes? A multimillion-dollar question - SCOTUSblog
Are Alaska Native corporations — special corporations that Congress created in 1971 when it resolved Native claims ...
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Four Democrats unveiled legislation today to expand the size of the Supreme Court from nine justices to 13 -- but Democratic leaders in both the House and Senate quickly threw cold water on the proposal.
Here's our report from @jamesromoser:
Bill to enlarge the Supreme Court faces dim prospects in Congress - SCOTUSblog
Four congressional Democrats introduced legislation Thursday to expand the number of seats on the Supreme Court from ...
We're so excited about our April 15 Live Webinar (w/ @HarvardACS & @HarvardFedSoc), Covering the Court, featuring an all-star lineup of panelists @jduffyrice, @katieleebarlow, @whignewtons, & @stevenmazie! _👩⚖️👩⚖️👩⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️_ Register here ➡️ https://harvard.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_k_b_9IPBQ_GV37rpsjF9kw
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.