|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|20-1474||Cal. Ct. App.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2021|
Issues: (1) Whether federal statutes must contain express privilege language before courts may decide that Congress intended the statute to create an evidentiary privilege that abrogates the legislated subpoena and discovery rules, and impedes judicial truth-seeking, as the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the 9th, 10th and 11th Circuits have ruled, or whether courts may read ambiguous silence in statutory text to impliedly create such a privilege, as the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the District of Columbia, 3rd and 5th Circuits, and the lower courts in this case, have ruled; and (2) whether the Stored Communications Act yields to judicial process, as the 9th Circuit has presumed, or whether the act impliedly creates a novel, unqualified evidentiary privilege for the Internet that bars judicial subpoenas requested by non-governmental litigants, as the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, the Ohio State Supreme Court, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals and the lower courts in this case have ruled.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Apr 13 2021||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 20, 2021)|
|May 04 2021||Waiver of right of respondent GitHub, Inc. to respond filed.|
|May 20 2021||Brief amici curiae of Legal Scholars and Scientists filed.|
|May 20 2021||Brief amici curiae of The National Association for Public Defense, et al. filed.|
|May 25 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/10/2021.|
|Jun 07 2021||Response Requested. (Due July 7, 2021)|
|Jun 09 2021||Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 7, 2021 to August 6, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jun 10 2021||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 6, 2021.|
|Aug 06 2021||Brief of respondent GitHub, Inc. in opposition filed.|
|Aug 23 2021||Reply of petitioner Joseph Colone filed. (Distributed)|
|Aug 25 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.|
|Oct 04 2021||Petition DENIED.|
NEW: The Justice Department, as expected, says it plans to ask the Supreme Court to block enforcement of the Texas law that bans abortions after six weeks of pregnancy.
NEW: Biden's commission studying proposals for Supreme Court reform has released 200+ pages of "discussion materials" in advance of its final report, slated to be issued next month. The materials are divided into five categories and are available here: https://www.whitehouse.gov/pcscotus/public-meetings/october-15-2021-pcscotus-meeting/
Curious: This morning the Supreme Court website had a dropdown menu option called “financial disclosure reports” (although nothing to see when you click on it). Now it’s gone
Today at SCOTUS: The Biden administration will appear before the justices asking to reinstate the death penalty for Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev -- despite Biden's campaign pledge to end the death penalty and the DOJ's recent moratorium on federal executions.
Brett Kavanaugh was back on the bench today after participating in last week's arguments remotely due to his positive COVID test. Here's the full nine-person bench, in a sketch by @Courtartist.
#SCOTUS calls for the views of the US Solicitor General in Epic Systems v. Tata Consultancy Services, re whether a punitive damages award that complies with a state law that caps punitive damages passes constitutional muster