|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|19-422||5th Cir.||Dec 9, 2020||TBD||TBD||TBD||OT 2020|
Issues: (1) Whether the Federal Housing Finance Agency’s structure violates the separation of powers; and (2) whether the courts must set aside a final agency action that FHFA took when it was unconstitutionally structured and strike down the statutory provisions that make FHFA independent.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Sep 25 2019||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 30, 2019)|
|Oct 30 2019||Brief of respondents Mnuchin, Steven T., et al. in opposition filed.|
|Oct 30 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Blackwells Capital LLC filed.|
|Nov 12 2019||Reply of petitioners Patrick J. Collins, et al. filed.|
|Dec 11 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.|
|Jun 29 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 7/1/2020.|
|Jul 08 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 7/8/2020.|
|Jul 09 2020||Petition GRANTED. The petition for a writ of certiorari in No. 19-563 is granted. The cases are consolidated, and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument. VIDED.|
|Jul 09 2020||Because the Court has consolidated these cases for briefing and oral argument, future filings and activity in the cases will now be reflected on the docket of No. 19-422. Subsequent filings in these cases must therefore be submitted through the electronic filing system in No. 19-422. Each document submitted in connection with one or more of these cases must include on its cover the case number and caption for each case in which the filing is intended to be submitted. Where a filing is submitted in fewer than all of the cases, the docket entry will reflect the case number(s) in which the filing is submitted; a document filed in all of the consolidated cases will be noted as “VIDED.”|
|Aug 17 2020||Aaron Nielson, Esquire, of Provo, Utah, is invited to brief and argue, as amicus curiae, in support of the position that the structure of the Federal Housing Finance Agency does not violate the separation of powers. VIDED.|
|Aug 17 2020||Joint appendix filed. VIDED.|
|Aug 17 2020||Brief of Federal Parties filed. (in 19-563)|
|Aug 18 2020||Mnuchin, et al., shall file an opening brief on the questions presented by the petition in No. 19-563, limited to 13,000 words, by Monday, August 17, 2020. Collins, et al., shall file a consolidated response in No. 19-563 and opening brief in No. 19-422, limited to 20,000 words, by Wednesday, September 16, 2020. That brief shall bear a light red cover. The Court-appointed amicus curiae shall file a brief, limited to 13,000 words, by Friday, October 16, 2020. That brief shall bear a dark green cover. Mnuchin, et al., shall file a consolidated reply and response brief, limited to 13,000 words, by Friday, October 23, 2020. Collins, et al., shall file a consolidated reply and response brief to brief of Court-appointed amicus curiae, limited to 6,000 words, by Monday, November 23, 2020. That brief shall bear a tan cover. The brief of any amicus curiae in support of Collins, et al., or in support of neither set of parties, shall be filed by Wednesday, September 23, 2020. Those briefs shall bear a light green cover. The brief of any amicus curiae in support of Mnuchin, et al., or in support of Court-appointed amicus curiae, shall be filed by Friday, October 30, 2020. Those briefs shall bear a dark green cover. VIDED.|
|Aug 19 2020||Blanket Consent filed by Mnuchin, Steven T., et al. VIDED.|
|Sep 15 2020||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Patrick J. Collins, et al.|
|Sep 16 2020||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, December 9, 2020. VIDED.|
|Sep 16 2020||Brief of Patrick J. Collins, et al. filed. VIDED.|
|Sep 22 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Timothy Howard filed. VIDED.|
|Sep 23 2020||Brief amicus curiae of New Civil Liberties Alliance filed.|
|Sep 23 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation filed. VIDED.|
|Sep 23 2020||Brief amici curiae of Institutional Investors in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac filed. VIDED.|
|Sep 23 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Thomas P. Vartanian filed. VIDED.|
|Sep 23 2020||Brief amici curiae of Scholars filed. VIDED.|
|Sep 23 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Americans for Prosperity Foundation filed. VIDED.|
|Sep 23 2020||Brief amici curiae of Bryndon Fisher, et al. in support of neither party filed.(in 19-563)|
|Oct 08 2020||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 5th Circuit.|
|Oct 14 2020||Record received from the U.S.C.A. 5th Circuit is electronic and located on PACER.|
|Oct 16 2020||Brief of Court-appointed amicus curiae filed. VIDED|
|Oct 23 2020||Reply and Response Brief for the Federal Parties filed. VIDED. (Distributed)|
|Oct 27 2020||CIRCULATED|
|Oct 30 2020||Motion for enlargement of time for oral argument and for divided argument filed by the Acting Solicitor General. VIDED.|
|Oct 30 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Constitutional Accountability Center filed. VIDED (Distributed)|
|Oct 30 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Professor John Harrison filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 30 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Jed H. Shugerman filed. VIDED. (Distributed)|
|Nov 09 2020||Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for enlargement of time for oral argument and for divided argument GRANTED, and the time is allotted as follows: 35 minutes for the Acting Solicitor General, 15 minutes for the Court-appointed amicus curiae, and 40 minutes for Patrick Collins, et al. VIDED.|
|Nov 19 2020||Reply of petitioners Patrick J. Collins, et al. filed. VIDED. (Distributed)|
|Dec 09 2020||Argued. For federal parties: Hashim M. Mooppan, Counselor to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For Court-appointed amicus curiae: Aaron L. Nielson, Provo, Utah. For petitioners in 19-422 & respondents in 19-563: David H. Thompson, Washington, D. C. VIDED.|
|Mar 18 2021||Letter of the federal parties notifying the Court of amendments to the Preferred Stock Purchase Agreements between Treasury and FHFA on behalf of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac filed. VIDED. (Distributed)|
|Mar 31 2021||Letter in response of Patrick J. Collins, et al. filed. VIDED. (Distributed)|
NEW: The Supreme Court rules against the FTC in a dispute with a payday loan company over the extent of the FTC's authority to seek monetary restitution from companies engaged in deceptive practices. SCOTUS says 9-0 that FTC doesn't have that authority under the statute at issue.
NEW: The Supreme Court sides against the federal government and in favor of people who brought Social Security claims in a technical ruling about "exhaustion" rules (essentially, when in the bureaucratic process the claimants were required to raise certain legal arguments).
BREAKING: In 6-3 decision, SCOTUS declines to further limit the ability of states to sentence juveniles to life without parole. The court upholds the sentence of a Mississippi man who killed his grandfather when he was 15; says sentencing procedure did not violate 8th Amendment.
Supreme Court opinions in 15 minutes!
We’re LIVE right now discussing which opinions we could see today and answering your questions. Join us!
Announcement of opinions for Thursday, April 22 - SCOTUSblog
We will be live blogging on Thursday, April 22, as the court releases one or more opinions in argued cases. Th...
Today at the court:
A nuts-and-bolts question of civil procedure. After an appeal is decided, do courts have discretion to limit the administrative “costs” that the prevailing party can recover from the losing party?
Argument begins at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Justices to consider awards of costs of appellate litigation - SCOTUSblog
Wednesday’s argument in City of San Antonio v. Hotels.com brings the justices a basic nuts-and-bolts question of...
In 2019, the Supreme Court limited the scope of a federal law that bans people convicted of felonies from having a gun. Up this morning at the court: back-to-back cases that will decide how many felon-in-possession convictions will need new trials or pleas under that 2019 ruling.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.