Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
12-1094 | Ok. | Not Argued | Nov 4, 2013 | TBD | Per Curiam | OT 2013 |
Issue: Whether the Oklahoma Supreme Court erred in holding – without analysis or discussion – that the Oklahoma law requiring that abortion-inducing drugs be administered according to the protocol described on the drugs’ FDA-approved labels is facially unconstitutional under Planned Parenthood v. Casey. Pursuant to the Revised Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act, Okla. Stat., Tit. 20, §1601 et seq. (West 2002), respectfully certifies to the Supreme Court of Oklahoma the following question: Whether H.B. No. 1970, Section 1, Chapter 216, O.S.L. 2011 prohibits: (1) the use of misoprostol to induce abortions, including the use of misoprostol in conjunction with mifepristone according to a protocol approved by the Food and Drug Administration; and (2) the use of methotrexate to treat ectopic pregnancies. Further proceedings in this case are reserved pending receipt of a response from the Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
Judgment: Dismissed as improvidently granted. in a per curiam opinion on November 4, 2013.
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
Mar 4 2013 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 8, 2013) |
Mar 26 2013 | Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioner. |
Apr 1 2013 | Waiver of right of respondents Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Justice, et al. to respond filed. |
Apr 5 2013 | Brief amici curiae of Women and Families Hurt by RU-486 filed. |
Apr 8 2013 | Brief amici curiae of Family Research Council, and Alliance Defending Freedom filed. |
Apr 8 2013 | Brief amicus curiae of Eagle Forum Education & Legal Defense Fund, Inc. filed. |
Apr 8 2013 | Brief amicus curiae of Dr. John Thorp, M.D., et al. filed. |
Apr 8 2013 | Brief amici curiae of 79 Oklahoma Legislators filed. |
Apr 16 2013 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 9, 2013. |
Apr 22 2013 | Response Requested . (Due May 22, 2013) |
May 16 2013 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including May 28, 2013. |
May 28 2013 | Brief of respondents Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Justice, et al. in opposition filed. |
Jun 3 2013 | Reply of petitioners Terry Cline, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
Jun 4 2013 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 20, 2013. |
Jun 25 2013 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 26, 2013. |
Jun 27 2013 | Petition GRANTED. This Court, pursuant to the Revised Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act, Okla. Stat., Tit. 20 Sec. 1601 et seq. (West 2002) respectfully certifies to the Supreme Court of Oklahoma the following question: Whether H. B. No. 1970, Section 1, Chapter 216, O.S.L. 2011 prohibits: (1) the use of misoprostol to induce abortions, including the use of misoprostol in conjunction with mifepristone according to a protocol approved by the Food and Drug Administration; and (2) the use of methotrexate to treat eptopic pregnancies. Further proceedings in this case are reserved pending receipt of a response from the Supreme Court of Oklahoma. |
Oct 29 2013 | Answer to certified questions filed. |
Nov 4 2013 | Writ of certiorari DISMISSED as improvidently granted. |
Dec 6 2013 | MANDATE ISSUED. |
BREAKING: SCOTUS orders California’s Santa Clara County to allow churches to hold indoor services. Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan dissent. Here’s the short shadow docket order.
#SCOTUS grants emergency request from northern California churches to allow indoor worship services pending appeal, says result is "clearly dictated" by recent decision. Kagan dissents, joined by Breyer & Sotomayor: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/022621zr_1bo2.pdf
Just in: SCOTUS opinions expected next Thursday.
#SCOTUS website indicates that the Court will release orders from today's conference on Monday morning, March 1, at 9:30 am, with opinions again on Thursday, March 4, at 10 am. Justices will also hear oral arguments next week, including in Arizona voting dispute on Tuesday.
Apparently all the action today at #SCOTUS was not limited to opinion announcements at 10 am. Major new cert. petition filed today challenging Harvard admissions policy. https://twitter.com/GregStohr/status/1364962610177843210
NEW: Supreme Court asked to outlaw race-based college admissions. Group challenging Harvard admissions policy says it files appeal asking court to over 2003 Grutter decision.
SCOTUS rules against a college student who tried to sue police officers after they mistook him for a criminal suspect and tackled/beat him. The unanimous ruling involves a technical interpretation of the "judgment bar" under the Federal Tort Claims Act. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/19-546_7mip.pdf
We're LIVE now. Opinions in 13 minutes. Come chat with us while we wait.
At 10:00 a.m. EST, the Supreme Court will hand down one or more opinions in argued cases.
We’ll be live blogging through it at 9:45 with @AHoweBlogger, Mark Walsh, and @jamesromoser.
Join us! https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/02/announcement-of-opinions-for-thursday-feb-25/
At 10:00 a.m. EST, the Supreme Court will hand down one or more opinions in argued cases.
We’ll be live blogging through it at 9:45 with @AHoweBlogger, Mark Walsh, and @jamesromoser.
Join us!
Announcement of opinions for Thursday, Feb. 25 - SCOTUSblog
We will be live blogging on Thursday, Feb. 25, as the court releases opinions from the 2020-21 term. This live ...
www.scotusblog.com
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.