|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|16-641||8th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 16|
Issue: Whether a contractual forum-selection clause purporting to override the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974's venue provision is invalid and unenforceable under ERISA.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Nov 14 2016||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 14, 2016)|
|Nov 18 2016||Consent the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for petitioner.|
|Nov 18 2016||Application (16A503) for a stay pending the disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Alito.|
|Nov 22 2016||Application (16A503) denied by Justice Alito.|
|Dec 2 2016||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by The Pension Rights Center.|
|Dec 22 2016||Waiver of right of respondent Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc., et al. to respond filed.|
|Dec 28 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 13, 2017.|
|Jan 17 2017||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by The Pension Rights Center GRANTED.|
|Jan 17 2017||Petition DENIED.|
Today, for the first time in 10 years, the Senate Judiciary Committee advanced the Cameras in the Courtroom Act, which would require video recording of Supreme Court oral arguments and opinion announcements.
Text - S.807 - 117th Congress (2021-2022): Cameras in the Courtroom Act
Text for S.807 - 117th Congress (2021-2022): Cameras in the Courtroom Act
In clash between private property rights and pro-union interests, the Supreme Court invalidates a California regulation that requires agricultural employers to allow union organizers onto their property to speak with workers. SCOTUS says the regulation violates the 5th Amendment.
BREAKING: In major First Amendment case on student speech, the Supreme Court rules 8-1 in favor of a former high school student who was disciplined by her public school after sending a vulgar message on Snapchat complaining about the school's cheerleading squad.
In the second Supreme Court opinion of the day, the court holds that the structure of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (which regulates Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac) is unconstitutional because of the limits on the president's ability to remove the agency's director.
The Supreme Court issues its opinion in the "hot pursuit" case -- a case about when police can follow a fleeing suspect into a home without a warrant. In an opinion by Kagan, the court declines to adopt a bright-line rule on "hot pursuits" of people suspected of misdemeanors.
The Supreme Court will release one or more opinions at 10:00 a.m. Join us on the live blog beginning at 9:45. https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/06/announcement-of-opinions-for-wednesday-june-23/
After the Supreme Court handed down three opinions this morning, 12 cases remain outstanding for this term. They include voting rights, student free speech, and anonymous donors. We expect more opinions on Wednesday, June 23 at 10:00 a.m. ET.
We will open the live blog at 9:45.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.