Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
16-572 | D.C. Cir. | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | OT 2016 |
Issues: (1) Whether, under the Indian Reorganization Act, to have been a “recognized Indian tribe now under Federal jurisdiction” in 1934, a tribe must have been “recognized” at that time; and (2) whether, to have been “under Federal jurisdiction” in 1934, a tribe must have been located in Indian country—that is, on land over which the United States exercised jurisdiction to the exclusion of state jurisdiction.
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
Oct 27 2016 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 28, 2016) |
Nov 23 2016 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including December 28, 2016, for all respondents. |
Nov 23 2016 | Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by California State Association of Counties, et al. |
Nov 28 2016 | Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for respondent Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde Community of Oregon. |
Nov 28 2016 | Brief amici curiae of California Tribal Business Alliance, et al. filed. |
Dec 20 2016 | Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including January 27, 2017. |
Jan 18 2017 | Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including February 17, 2017. |
Feb 17 2017 | Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including March 1, 2017. |
Mar 1 2017 | Brief of Federal respondents in opposition filed. |
Mar 1 2017 | Brief of respondent The Cowlitz Indian Tribe in opposition filed. |
Mar 15 2017 | Reply of petitioners Citizens Against Reservation Shopping, et al. filed. |
Mar 15 2017 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 31, 2017. |
Apr 3 2017 | Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by California State Association of Counties, et al. GRANTED. |
Apr 3 2017 | Petition DENIED. |
BREAKING: SCOTUS orders California’s Santa Clara County to allow churches to hold indoor services. Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan dissent. Here’s the short shadow docket order.
#SCOTUS grants emergency request from northern California churches to allow indoor worship services pending appeal, says result is "clearly dictated" by recent decision. Kagan dissents, joined by Breyer & Sotomayor: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/022621zr_1bo2.pdf
Just in: SCOTUS opinions expected next Thursday.
#SCOTUS website indicates that the Court will release orders from today's conference on Monday morning, March 1, at 9:30 am, with opinions again on Thursday, March 4, at 10 am. Justices will also hear oral arguments next week, including in Arizona voting dispute on Tuesday.
Apparently all the action today at #SCOTUS was not limited to opinion announcements at 10 am. Major new cert. petition filed today challenging Harvard admissions policy. https://twitter.com/GregStohr/status/1364962610177843210
NEW: Supreme Court asked to outlaw race-based college admissions. Group challenging Harvard admissions policy says it files appeal asking court to over 2003 Grutter decision.
SCOTUS rules against a college student who tried to sue police officers after they mistook him for a criminal suspect and tackled/beat him. The unanimous ruling involves a technical interpretation of the "judgment bar" under the Federal Tort Claims Act. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/19-546_7mip.pdf
We're LIVE now. Opinions in 13 minutes. Come chat with us while we wait.
At 10:00 a.m. EST, the Supreme Court will hand down one or more opinions in argued cases.
We’ll be live blogging through it at 9:45 with @AHoweBlogger, Mark Walsh, and @jamesromoser.
Join us! https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/02/announcement-of-opinions-for-thursday-feb-25/
At 10:00 a.m. EST, the Supreme Court will hand down one or more opinions in argued cases.
We’ll be live blogging through it at 9:45 with @AHoweBlogger, Mark Walsh, and @jamesromoser.
Join us!
Announcement of opinions for Thursday, Feb. 25 - SCOTUSblog
We will be live blogging on Thursday, Feb. 25, as the court releases opinions from the 2020-21 term. This live ...
www.scotusblog.com
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.