|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|14-857||9th Cir.||Oct 14, 2015||Jan 20, 2016||6-3||Ginsburg||OT 2015|
Holding: 1) An unaccepted settlement offer or offer of judgment does not moot a plaintiff's case, so the district court retains jurisdiction to adjudicate the plaintiff’s complaint. 2) A federal contractor is not entitled to immunity from suit for its violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act when it violated both federal law and the government's explicit instructions.
Judgment: Affirmed and remanded, 6-3, in an opinion by Justice Ginsburg on January 20, 2016. Justice Thomas filed an opinion concurring in the judgment. Chief Justice Roberts filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justices Scalia and Alito joined. Justice Alito filed a dissenting opinion.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Dec 5 2014||Application (14A598) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 18, 2014 to January 19, 2015, submitted to Justice Kennedy.|
|Dec 8 2014||Application (14A598) granted by Justice Kennedy extending the time to file until January 19, 2015.|
|Jan 16 2015||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 19, 2015)|
|Feb 10 2015||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including March 23, 2015.|
|Feb 19 2015||Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, and Business Roundtable filed.|
|Mar 23 2015||Brief of respondent Jose Gomez in opposition filed.|
|Apr 7 2015||Reply of petitioner Campbell-Ewald Company filed.|
|Apr 8 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 24, 2015.|
|Apr 13 2015||Supplemental brief of respondent Jose Gomez filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 14 2015||Response to supplemental brief of respondent from petitioner filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 23 2015||Rescheduled.|
|Apr 27 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 1, 2015.|
|May 4 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 14, 2015.|
|May 18 2015||Petition GRANTED.|
|Jun 10 2015||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs in support of either party or of neither party received from counsel for the respondent.|
|Jun 23 2015||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including July 16, 2015.|
|Jun 23 2015||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including August 24, 2015.|
|Jun 30 2015||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioner.|
|Jul 16 2015||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)|
|Jul 16 2015||Brief of petitioner Campbell-Ewald Company filed.|
|Jul 21 2015||Brief amici curiae of DRI - The Voice of the Defense Bar & PSC - The Voice of the Government Services Industry filed.|
|Jul 23 2015||Brief amicus curiae of Washington Legal Foundation filed.|
|Jul 23 2015||Brief amicus curiae of Consumer Data Industry Association filed.|
|Jul 23 2015||Brief amicus curiae of The National Black Chamber of Commerce filed.|
|Jul 23 2015||Brief amicus curiae of National Defense Industrial Association filed.|
|Jul 23 2015||Brief amicus curiae of KBR, Inc. filed.|
|Jul 23 2015||Brief amici curiae of The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and Business Roundtable filed.|
|Jul 23 2015||Brief amicus curiae of Lawyers for Civil Justice filed.|
|Jul 23 2015||Brief amicus curiae of Trans Union LLC filed.|
|Jul 29 2015||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, October 14, 2015.|
|Aug 12 2015||Record requested from U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit.|
|Aug 12 2015||The record from U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit is electronic and located on PACER. Part of the record received is SEALED.|
|Aug 12 2015||The record from U.S.D.C. Central Dist. of CA. Western Div.- Los Angeles is electronic and located on PACER. Part of the record received is SEALED.|
|Aug 24 2015||Brief of respondent Jose Gomez filed. (Distributed)|
|Aug 27 2015||Brief amicus curiae of Constitutional Accountability Center filed.|
|Aug 31 2015||Brief amicus curiae of the United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Aug 31 2015||Brief amicus curiae of National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Inc. filed. (Distributed)|
|Aug 31 2015||Brief amici curiae of Legal Aid Society of the District of Columbia, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Aug 31 2015||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.|
|Aug 31 2015||CIRCULATED|
|Aug 31 2015||Brief amicus curiae of American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations filed. (Distributed)|
|Aug 31 2015||Brief amici curiae of Public Justice, P.C. and AARP Foundation Litigation filed. (Distributed)|
|Aug 31 2015||Brief amicus curiae of NECA-IBEW Welfare Trust Fund filed. (Distributed)|
|Aug 31 2015||Brief amici curiae of National Employment Lawyers Association, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Sep 22 2015||Reply of petitioner Campbell-Ewald Company filed. (Distributed)|
|Sep 28 2015||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.|
|Oct 14 2015||Argued. For petitioner: Gregory G. Garre, Bethesda, Md. For respondent: Jonathan F. Mitchell, Stanford, Cal.; and Anthony A. Yang, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.)|
|Jan 20 2016||Judgment is affirmed and case remanded. Ginsburg, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Kennedy, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Thomas, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment. Roberts, C. J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Scalia and Alito, JJ., joined. Alito, J., filed a dissenting opinion.|
|Feb 23 2016||Judgment Issued|
#SCOTUS does not take up 2nd question in the case, on whether to overrule its 2020 decision in McGirt v. Oklahoma. Full order is here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/012122zr_3f14.pdf https://twitter.com/AHoweBlogger/status/1484606315519516675
#SCOTUS grants one new case, sets it for argument in April: Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta, on whether a state has authority to prosecute non-Indians who commit crimes against Indians in Indian country.
More opinions coming on Monday.
#SCOTUS website indicates that the Court is expected to release more opinions on Monday morning at 10 am.
The next #SCOTUS grants? Kevin McCarthy v. Nancy Pelosi in a fight over congressional proxy voting; the First Amendment-based ministerial exception to employment law returns; nondelegation doctrine (!); and the constitutionality of the FTC's structure.
Revenge of the rescheduled cases: Congressional proxy voting, the ministerial exception, and more - SCOTUSblog
The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming con...
JUST IN: The Supreme Court, over dissents from the three liberal justices, rejects a request from Texas abortion clinics to immediately return the litigation over Texas' six-week abortion law to a federal district court.
The Supreme Court issues a single opinion today, ruling in an 8-1 vote that a criminal defendant's rights were violated under the Sixth Amendment's confrontation clause when the government introduced a plea allocution from another proceeding. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-637_10n2.pdf
Today at SCOTUS: We expect one or more opinions in argued cases to be issued starting at 10 a.m. EST. At 9:45, we'll fire up our live blog, where we'll also chat about this week's arguments and last night's ruling on Trump records. Grab your ☕️ & join us!
Announcement of opinions for Thursday, Jan. 20 - SCOTUSblog
On Thursday, January 20, we will be live blogging as the court releases opinions in one or more argued cases f...