|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|16-1371||3d Cir.||Jan 9, 2018||May 14, 2018||9-0||Kennedy||OT 2017|
Holding: The mere fact that a driver in lawful possession or control of a rental car is not listed on the rental agreement will not defeat his or her otherwise reasonable expectation of privacy protected by the Fourth Amendment.
Judgment: Vacated and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Kennedy on May 14, 2018. Justice Thomas filed a concurring opinion, in which Justice Gorsuch joined. Justice Alito filed a concurring opinion.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|May 11 2017||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 15, 2017)|
|Jun 08 2017||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including July 17, 2017.|
|Jun 12 2017||Brief amicus curiae of National Association for Public Defense filed.|
|Jul 17 2017||Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.|
|Aug 01 2017||Reply of petitioner Terrence Byrd filed. (Distributed)|
|Aug 02 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/25/2017.|
|Sep 28 2017||Petition GRANTED.|
|Nov 13 2017||Brief of petitioner Terrence Byrd filed.|
|Nov 13 2017||Joint appendix filed.|
|Nov 15 2017||Brief amicus curiae of Southwestern Law Student Lindsey N. Ursua, et al. filed.|
|Nov 16 2017||Brief amicus curiae of Restore the Fourth, Inc. filed.|
|Nov 17 2017||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Tuesday, January 9, 2018|
|Nov 20 2017||Brief amici curiae of The American Civil Liberties Union and The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed.|
|Nov 20 2017||Brief amicus curiae of National Motorists Association filed.|
|Nov 20 2017||Brief amici curiae of National Ass'n for Public Defense and the National Ass'n of Federal Defenders filed.|
|Nov 20 2017||Brief amici curiae of Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), et al. filed.|
|Nov 20 2017||Brief amicus curiae of Morgan A. Cloud filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 20 2017||Brief amici curiae of Fourth Amendment Scholars filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 22 2017||CIRCULATED.|
|Dec 13 2017||Brief of respondent United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 18 2017||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 3rd Circuit.|
|Dec 20 2017||Brief amici curiae of Arizona, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 28 2017||Record received from the United States District Court Middle District of Pennsylvania (Harrisburg). The record is electronic.|
|Dec 28 2017||Record received from the U.S.C.A. 3rd Circuit is electronic, and contain some Sealed Documents.|
|Dec 28 2017||Reply of petitioner Terrence Byrd filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 09 2018||Argued. For petitioner: Robert M. Loeb, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Eric J. Feigin, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.|
|May 14 2018||Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Kennedy, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. Thomas, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which Gorsuch, J., joined. Alito, J., filed a concurring opinion.|
|Jun 15 2018||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
New on the shadow docket: Florida seeks an emergency order blocking CDC policies that substantially limit cruise ships from sailing.
Florida asks #SCOTUS to block, pending appeal, CDC restrictions imposed on cruise industry b/c of COVID-19 pandemic: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A5.pdf
NEW: Mississippi formally asks the Supreme Court to overturn its landmark abortion case, Roe v. Wade, in latest court filing. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1392/184703/20210722161332385_19-1392BriefForPetitioners.pdf
Biden’s SCOTUS reform commission met yesterday and discussed several reform ideas including adding justices and adopting a formal code of ethics.
Term limits emerged as a popular idea. But how to implement it — via statute or constitutional amendment?
Term limits emerge as popular proposal at latest meeting of court-reform commission - SCOTUSblog
The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court reconvened on Tuesday to hear from a new set of experts on vari...
I really enjoyed getting to chat with the incomparable @AHoweBlogger about (1) why #SCOTUS's "shadow docket" *is* a big deal; (2) why it's so hard to figure out how to include it in broader assessments of the Justices' work; and (3) some possible ways to include it going forward. https://twitter.com/SCOTUSblog/status/1417545384314949635
How do you solve a problem like the shadow docket? @steve_vladeck has some thoughts and shared them with @AHoweBlogger in the latest SCOTUStalk.
The Supreme Court has rescinded its COVID-related orders related to filing, but no word on resuming in-person oral arguments in October.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.