|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
Issue: Whether, when a court permits an unemancipated minor to have an abortion, the state may require that her parents be notified before the abortion occurs except where such notice would contravene her best interests.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Mar 29 2021||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 3, 2021)|
|Apr 19 2021||Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 3, 2021 to June 17, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Apr 20 2021||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted in part; the time is extended to and including June 2, 2021.|
|May 03 2021||Amicus brief of Eighty-Eight Women Who Underwent Abortions as Minors and Suffered Harm not accepted for filing. (May 04, 2021 - Corrected brief to be submitted)|
|May 03 2021||Brief amicus curiae of Americans United for Life filed.|
|May 03 2021||Brief amici curiae of Eighty-Eight Women Who Underwent Abortions as Minors and Suffered Harm filed.|
|May 03 2021||Brief amicus curiae of Susan B. Anthony List filed.|
|May 03 2021||Brief amicus curiae of Judicial Watch, Inc. filed.|
|May 03 2021||Brief amici curiae of Kentucky, Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Idaho, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, and West Virginia filed.|
|May 03 2021||Brief amicus curiae of Charlotte Lozier Institute filed.|
|May 03 2021||Brief amicus curiae of American Center for Law and Justice filed.|
|Jun 02 2021||Brief of respondent Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc. in opposition filed.|
|Jun 07 2021||Reply of petitioners Kristina Box, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jun 08 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/24/2021.|
Having covered the Supreme Court for six decades, @lylden has seen a lot of changes at 1 First Street. In the latest piece in our series on the post-COVID court, Lyle examines how the court's pandemic operations could spur permanent reform.
How has COVID-19 changed the Supreme Court? And are any of those changes worth keeping? Today we launch a symposium examining those questions.
First up, a piece from @stevenmazie on how to reform oral arguments after the pandemic.
The court after COVID: A recipe for oral argument reform - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court has not yet announced whether it will return to normal operations when the 2021-22 term begins ...
NEW shadow-docket case: New York landlords ask SCOTUS for an emergency order to prevent the state from continuing to enforce its COVID-related eviction moratorium. They say the moratorium "runs roughshod" over their constitutional rights.
Filing here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A8-1.pdf
New on the shadow docket: Florida seeks an emergency order blocking CDC policies that substantially limit cruise ships from sailing.
Florida asks #SCOTUS to block, pending appeal, CDC restrictions imposed on cruise industry b/c of COVID-19 pandemic: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A5.pdf
NEW: Mississippi formally asks the Supreme Court to overturn its landmark abortion case, Roe v. Wade, in latest court filing. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1392/184703/20210722161332385_19-1392BriefForPetitioners.pdf
Biden’s SCOTUS reform commission met yesterday and discussed several reform ideas including adding justices and adopting a formal code of ethics.
Term limits emerged as a popular idea. But how to implement it — via statute or constitutional amendment?
Term limits emerge as popular proposal at latest meeting of court-reform commission - SCOTUSblog
The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court reconvened on Tuesday to hear from a new set of experts on vari...