|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|19-1385||7th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2020|
Issue: Whether a state, consistent with the 14th Amendment due process and equal protection clauses, may adopt a biology-based birth-certificate system that includes a rebuttable presumption that a birth mother’s husband — but not wife — is the child’s biological parent.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jun 15 2020||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 17, 2020)|
|Jun 23 2020||Waiver of right of respondent Ashlee and Ruby Henderson, et al. to respond filed.|
|Jul 01 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.|
|Sep 28 2020||Response Requested. (Due October 28, 2020)|
|Oct 09 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 28, 2020 to November 10, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Oct 13 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 10, 2020.|
|Oct 28 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Them Before Us filed.|
|Nov 10 2020||Brief of respondents Ashlee and Ruby Henderson, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Nov 23 2020||Reply of petitioner Kristina Box, In Her Official Capacity as Commissioner, Indiana State Department of Health filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 24 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/11/2020.|
|Dec 14 2020||Petition DENIED.|
Today at SCOTUS: Can the federal government prioritize certain groups of unauthorized immigrants for deportation over others? And do states have standing to sue the government if they disagree with those priorities? @AHoweBlogger previews U.S. v. Texas: https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/11/in-u-s-v-texas-broad-questions-over-immigration-enforcement-and-states-ability-to-challenge-federal-policies/
Today at SCOTUS: The justices return to the bench for oral arguments in a pair of public-corruption cases, both stemming from scandals in New York politics that arose during Andrew Cuomo's time as governor. In both cases, the defendants are claiming prosecutorial overreach.
Cecilia (Cissy) Suyat Marshall, the widow of Thurgood Marshall, died this morning at 94. Here is the court's announcement.
BREAKING: The Supreme Court REJECTS Trump's bid to prevent the House Ways & Means Committee from obtaining his tax returns. No noted dissents.
The brief order may end years of litigation over the committee's efforts to review the tax records of Trump and his businesses.
JUST IN: Whisky, dog toys... and trademark law.
SCOTUS has agreed to hear a dispute between Jack Daniel's and a company that makes squeaking "Bad Spaniels" dog toys. The case will have implications for the tension between parody & intellectual property. https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/112122zr_e1p3.pdf
In a quiet Monday morning order list, SCOTUS adds no new cases to its docket. The court will not hear Brooks v. Abbott, a challenge to an alleged racial gerrymander of a state senate district in Texas. Here's the full order list: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/112122zor_7lhn.pdf