|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|19-5410||6th Cir.||Nov 3, 2020||TBD||TBD||TBD||OT 2020|
Issue: Whether the “use of force” clause in the Armed Career Criminal Act encompasses crimes with a mens rea of mere recklessness.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jul 24 2019||Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 30, 2019)|
|Aug 20 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 30, 2019 to September 30, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Aug 21 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 30, 2019.|
|Sep 24 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 30, 2019 to October 21, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Sep 25 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including October 21, 2019.|
|Sep 25 2019||Supplemental brief of petitioner Charles Borden, Jr. filed.|
|Oct 21 2019||Response to petition from respondent United States of America filed.|
|Oct 29 2019||Waiver of the 14-day waiting period under 15.5 filed.|
|Oct 31 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/15/2019.|
|Nov 07 2019||Rescheduled.|
|Dec 30 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/17/2020.|
|Jan 23 2020||Letter of petitioner Charles Borden, Jr. filed.|
|Feb 14 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.|
|Feb 24 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/28/2020.|
|Mar 02 2020||Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.|
|Mar 05 2020||Motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed.|
|Mar 16 2020||Motion to extend the time to file the briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including April 27, 2020. The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including June 8, 2020.|
|Mar 22 2020||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner Charles Borden, Jr.|
|Apr 20 2020||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner GRANTED.|
|Apr 27 2020||Brief of petitioner Charles Borden, Jr. filed.|
|Apr 30 2020||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Charles Borden, Jr.|
|May 04 2020||Brief amici curiae of Law Professors Leah Litman, et al. filed.|
|May 04 2020||Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed.|
|May 04 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Americans for Prosperity Foundation filed.|
|May 04 2020||Brief amici curiae of Immigrant Rights Organizations filed.|
|May 04 2020||Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Federal Defenders filed.|
|May 04 2020||Brief amicus curiae of FAMM filed.|
|Jun 08 2020||Brief of respondent United States of America filed.|
|Jun 15 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Criminal Justice Legal Foundation filed.|
|Jul 08 2020||Reply of petitioner Charles Borden, Jr. filed.|
|Aug 19 2020||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, November 3, 2020.|
|Aug 31 2020||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 6th Circuit.|
|Sep 01 2020||Record of the U.S.C.A. 6th Circuit electronically received (includes sealed material and district court record).|
|Sep 02 2020||CIRCULATED|
|Nov 03 2020||Argued. For petitioner: Kannon K. Shanmugam, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Eric J. Feigin, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.|
The clerk of the court just notified counsel in a juvenile sentencing case—that was sent back to a lower court this week in light of the court's decision in Jones v. Mississippi—that Justice Kagan unwittingly failed to recuse herself after participating in part of the case as SG.
It’s a quiet week, so now is a great time to listen to Judge John Owens regale @AHoweBlogger with the tale of Ashton Embry and the greatest leak in Supreme Court history.
Come for the high drama, stay for the good humor and an RBG story or two.
The biggest leak in Supreme Court history - SCOTUSblog
In a city full of anonymous sources, the Supreme Court is famously leak-proof. But a century ago, the court had ...
The US Supreme Court should overturn the Facebook’s “Oversight Board’s” “ruling” which upholds the outlawing of the 45th President of the United States from social media.
This is a big tech, corporate oligarchy without standing and it’s gone too far. Enough is enough.
The Supreme Court will hear its last case of the term today at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Here’s a summary of Terry v. United States in a TikTok minute.
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will tackle the legacy of the Reagan-era War on Drugs and Congress' attempt to reduce the punishment disparity between crack-cocaine and powder cocaine offenses.
As @ekownyankah notes, this case has a little bit of everything.
In final case the court will hear this term, profound issues of race, incarceration and the war on drugs - SCOTUSblog
Academics naturally believe that even obscure cases in their field are underappreciated; each minor tax or bankruptcy ...
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket filing in which a church argues that state COVID-related restrictions lack sufficient carveouts for religious worship. This one challenges Colorado's restrictions. It relies heavily on last month's ruling in Tandon v. Newsom.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.