|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|19-1186||4th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2020|
Issues: (1) Whether Medicaid recipients have a private right of action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 42 U.S.C. § 1396a(a)(23) to challenge a state’s determination that a specific provider is not qualified to provide certain medical services; and (2) what framework properly decides whether a statute creates a private right enforceable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jan 03 2020||Application (19A752) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 27, 2020 to March 27, 2020, submitted to The Chief Justice.|
|Jan 08 2020||Application (19A752) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until March 27, 2020.|
|Mar 27 2020||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 29, 2020)|
|Apr 14 2020||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Joshua Baker|
|Apr 24 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 29, 2020 to May 29, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Apr 24 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 29, 2020.|
|Apr 29 2020||Brief amicus curiae of American Center for Law and Justice filed.|
|Apr 29 2020||Brief amici curiae of Nebraska, Indiana, and 17 Other States filed.|
|Apr 29 2020||Brief amici curiae of 137 Members of Congress filed.|
|Apr 29 2020||Brief amici curiae of Family Policy Councils filed.|
|Apr 29 2020||Brief amici curiae of 86 Current and 2 Former South Carolina Legislators filed.|
|Apr 29 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Americans United for Life filed.|
|May 21 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 29, 2020 to June 29, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|May 22 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including June 29, 2020.|
|Jun 18 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 29, 2020 to July 29, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jun 19 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including July 29, 2020.|
|Jul 29 2020||Brief of respondents Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Aug 06 2020||Motion of petitioner to delay distribution of the petition for a writ of certiorari under Rule 15.5 from August 12, 2020 to September 16, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Aug 07 2020||Motion to delay distribution of the petition for a writ certiorari until September 16, 2020, granted.|
|Sep 15 2020||Reply of petitioner Joshua Baker filed. (Distributed)|
|Sep 16 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020.|
|Sep 22 2020||Supplemental brief of respondents Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 08 2020||Supplemental brief of petitioner Joshua Baker submitted.|
|Oct 13 2020||Petition DENIED.|
A majority of the Supreme Court seems inclined to uphold Mississippi's 15-week abortion law, but the six conservative justices appear divided about whether to entirely overrule Roe v. Wade. @AHoweBlogger's first take from this morning's argument:
Majority of court appears poised to uphold Mississippi’s ban on most abortions after 15 weeks - SCOTUSblog
It has been nearly 30 years since the Supreme Court’s decision in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, which reaffirme...
Starting momentarily: Oral argument in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, a case involving Mississippi’s attempt to ban nearly all abortions after 15 weeks. The state has asked the court to overturn Roe v. Wade. We’ll be live-tweeting the argument here in this thread.
Twenty minutes before the start of oral argument, here’s the scene outside the Supreme Court.
Photos by @katieleebarlow.
TODAY AT SCOTUS: The case that could determine the future of abortion in America. Oral argument begins at 10 a.m. EST. We'll be live-tweeting the full argument. You can also listen live here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx.
Here's our preview from @AHoweBlogger: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/11/roe-v-wade-hangs-in-balance-as-reshaped-court-prepares-to-hear-biggest-abortion-case-in-decades/
Our cross-platform coverage of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization includes, of course, TikTok. Follow us there if you don't already! And tune in for @katieleebarlow's live dispatch from outside the court tomorrow morning at 9:30 a.m. EST.
SCOTUS was inundated with "friend of the court" briefs -- more than 140 of them -- in the abortion case being heard tomorrow. We reviewed them all. Here's a guide to the many arguments being pushed by academics, politicians, & interest groups in the case.
We read all the amicus briefs in Dobbs so you don’t have to - SCOTUSblog
More than 140 amicus briefs were filed in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the potentially momentou...