Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20-480 | 6th Cir. | TBD | TBD | TBD | TBD | OT 2021 |
Issue: Whether a civil service pension received for federal civilian employment as a “military technician (dual status)” is “a payment based wholly on service as a member of a uniformed service” for the purposes of the Social Security Act’s windfall elimination provision.
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
Oct 08 2020 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 13, 2020) |
Oct 08 2020 | Pursuant to Rule 34.6 and Paragraph 9 of the Guidelines for the Submission of Documents to the Supreme Court's Electronic Filing System, filings in this case should be submitted in paper form only, and should not be submitted through the Court's electronic filing system. |
Oct 16 2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 13, 2020 to December 14, 2020, submitted to The Clerk. |
Oct 19 2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 14, 2020. |
Dec 03 2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 14, 2020 to January 13, 2021, submitted to The Clerk. |
Dec 04 2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including January 13, 2021. |
Jan 13 2021 | Brief of respondent Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security in opposition filed. |
Jan 27 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021. |
Jan 27 2021 | Reply of petitioner David Babcock filed. (Distributed) |
Feb 22 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/26/2021. |
Mar 01 2021 | Petition GRANTED. |
Mar 01 2021 | As Rule 34.6 provides, “If the Court schedules briefing and oral argument in a case that was governed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c) or Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 49.1(c), the parties shall submit electronic versions of all prior and subsequent filings with this Court in the case, subject to [applicable] redaction rules.” Subsequent party and amicus filings in the case should now be submitted through the Court’s electronic filing system, with any necessary redactions. |
NEW: After a request from the Biden administration yesterday, the Supreme Court just dismissed three pending cert petitions (requests to hear a case) about the Trump administration’s effort to withhold money from so-called sanctuary cities.
🚨 LIVE NOW 🚨 5PM on IGTV #SimplePolitics join me & @AHoweBlogger editor / reporter for the @SCOTUSblog for a great conversation on the recent decisions by the Supreme Court. There is so much to talk about.
Watch IGTV:
SimplePolitics with Kim Wehle - Special Guest Bill Kristol, Editor-At-Large, The Bulwark
Tonight on #SimplePolitics, Bill Kristol and I have an in-depth conversation about Impeachment, what‘s next for ...
bit.ly
ICYMI: We got Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s first majority opinion today.
SCOTUS rules against immigrant who has lived in the US without authorization for decades. The gov't sought to deport him based on a state misdemeanor conviction (he used a fake Social Security card to get a job). SCOTUS says 5-3 he's not eligible to seek protection from removal.
NEW: In Freedom of Information Act case, SCOTUS says federal government does not have to disclose documents that were produced as part of a rulemaking on "cooling water intake structures" under the Clean Water Act. The Sierra Club argued the docs should be disclosed under FOIA.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.