Applied Underwriters, Inc. v. Arrow Recycling Solutions, Inc.
Petition for certiorari denied on November 9, 2015Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
15-8 | Cal. Ct. App. | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | OT 2015 |
Issue: Whether a generic choice-of-law provision in an otherwise broad arbitration agreement, one that does not reference a particular state, should be read to reflect intent by the parties to avoid preemption under the Federal Arbitration Act and instead to apply a rule of that state that limits or bars arbitration of an otherwise covered dispute despite the strong preference for enforcement of arbitration provisions as expressed in the Federal Arbitration Act.
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
Jun 30 2015 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 31, 2015) |
Aug 12 2015 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 28, 2015. |
Aug 27 2015 | Response Requested . (Due September 28, 2015) |
Sep 28 2015 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including October 8, 2015. |
Oct 5 2015 | Brief of respondents Arrow Recycling Solutions, Inc., et al. in opposition filed. |
Oct 19 2015 | Reply of petitioners Applied Underwriters, Inc., et al. filed. |
Oct 21 2015 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 6, 2015. |
Nov 9 2015 | Petition DENIED. |