|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|21-869||2nd Cir.||TBD||TBD||TBD||TBD||OT 2022|
Issue: Whether a work of art is “transformative” when it conveys a different meaning or message from its source material (as the Supreme Court, U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, and other courts of appeals have held), or whether a court is forbidden from considering the meaning of the accused work where it “recognizably deriv[es] from” its source material (as the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit has held).
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Dec 09 2021||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 12, 2022)|
|Dec 29 2021||Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 12, 2022 to February 11, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Dec 30 2021||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 11, 2022.|
|Jan 10 2022||Brief amici curiae of Copyright Law Professors filed.|
|Jan 10 2022||Brief amici curiae of Barbara Kruger and Robert Storr filed.|
|Jan 12 2022||Brief amici curiae of Art Law Professors filed.|
|Jan 12 2022||Brief amici curiae of The Robert Rauschenberg Foundation, Roy Lichtenstein Foundation, and Brooklyn Museum filed.|
|Feb 04 2022||Brief of respondents Lynn Goldsmith, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Feb 23 2022||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/18/2022.|
|Feb 23 2022||Reply of petitioner The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 21 2022||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/25/2022.|
|Mar 28 2022||Petition GRANTED.|
|Apr 18 2022||Motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed.|
|May 02 2022||Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, Lynn Goldsmith, et al.|
|May 02 2022||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc.|
|May 04 2022||Motion to extend the time to file the briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including June 10, 2022. The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is extended to and including August 8, 2022.|
Just in: The next Supreme Court opinion day will be next Monday. The court expects to release one or more opinions in argued cases from the current term.
End of an era: Here is NBC News prez Noah Oppenheim's memo about Pete Williams' plan to retire this summer
The Supreme Court sides with Sen. Ted Cruz in his First Amendment challenge to a federal campaign-finance law that limits how and when candidates can recoup loans that they make to their own campaigns. The vote is 6-3 along ideological lines.
In an immigration case, SCOTUS rules 5-4 that federal courts do NOT have jurisdiction to review certain executive-branch factual findings that determine whether non-citizens are eligible for "adjustment of status." Those findings can dictate whether a person is deported.
SCOTUS agrees to take up two new cases: Jones v. Hendrix (a habeas corpus case) and SEC v. Cochran (a case about the power of district courts to hear challenges to the constitutionality of the SEC's administrative law proceedings). Full order list here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/051622zor_hgcj.pdf
We're live now on SCOTUSblog's homepage or at https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/05/announcement-of-orders-and-opinions-for-monday-may-16/
Today at SCOTUS: The court will issue one or more opinions in argued cases at 10 a.m. EDT. But first, orders on pending petitions at 9:30. We'll fire up our live blog at 9:25 to break it all down and answer your questions. Grab some ☕️ and come join us: https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/05/announcement-of-orders-and-opinions-for-monday-may-16/