|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|20-544||D.C. Cir.||Apr 19, 2021||TBD||TBD||TBD||OT 2020|
Issue: Whether Alaska Native regional and village corporations are “Indian tribes” under the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act and therefore are eligible for emergency-relief funds under Title V of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Oct 21 2020||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 25, 2020)|
|Nov 04 2020||Brief amicus curiae of State of Alaska filed.|
|Nov 13 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 25, 2020 to December 16, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Nov 16 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 16, 2020, for all respondents.|
|Nov 18 2020||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by US Senators Lisa Murkowski, et al. VIDED.|
|Nov 23 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Alaska Federation of Natives filed. VIDED.|
|Dec 16 2020||Brief of respondents Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation, et al., et al. in opposition filed. VIDED.|
|Dec 16 2020||Brief of respondents Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, et al. in opposition filed. VIDED.|
|Dec 16 2020||Brief of respondents Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation in opposition filed. VIDED. (Distributed)|
|Dec 22 2020||Letter waiving the 14-day waiting period for the distribution of the petition for a writ of certiorari pursuant to Rule 15.5. filed.|
|Dec 23 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.|
|Dec 23 2020||Reply of petitioners Alaska Native Village Corporation Association, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 08 2021||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by US Senators Lisa Murkowski, et al. GRANTED.|
|Jan 08 2021||Petition GRANTED. The petition for a writ of certiorari in No. 20-543 is granted. The cases are consolidated, and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument. VIDED.|
|Jan 08 2021||Because the Court has consolidated these cases for briefing and oral argument, future filings and activity in the cases will now be reflected on the docket of No. 20-543. Subsequent filings in these cases must therefore be submitted through the electronic filing system in No. 20-543. Each document submitted in connection with one or more of these cases must include on its cover the case number and caption for each case in which the filing is intended to be submitted. Where a filing is submitted in fewer than all of the cases, the docket entry will reflect the case number(s) in which the filing is submitted; a document filed in all of the consolidated cases will be noted as “VIDED.”|
|Mar 12 2021||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, April 19, 2021. VIDED.|
|Mar 15 2021||Record requested.|
|Mar 16 2021||The record received from the U.S. District and Bankruptcy Courts is electronic and located on Pacer.|
|Mar 16 2021||The record from the U.S.C.A. D.C. Circuit is electronic and located on Pacer.|
|Mar 30 2021||CIRCULATED|
|Mar 31 2021||Amicus brief of Professors and Historians not accepted for filing. (April 28, 2021--to be filed in lead case No. 20-543)|
|Apr 19 2021||Argued. For petitioner in 20-543: Matthew Guarnieri, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For petitioners in 20-544: Paul D. Clement, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Jeffrey S. Rasmussen, Louisville, Colo. VIDED.|
The clerk of the court just notified counsel in a juvenile sentencing case—that was sent back to a lower court this week in light of the court's decision in Jones v. Mississippi—that Justice Kagan unwittingly failed to recuse herself after participating in part of the case as SG.
It’s a quiet week, so now is a great time to listen to Judge John Owens regale @AHoweBlogger with the tale of Ashton Embry and the greatest leak in Supreme Court history.
Come for the high drama, stay for the good humor and an RBG story or two.
The biggest leak in Supreme Court history - SCOTUSblog
In a city full of anonymous sources, the Supreme Court is famously leak-proof. But a century ago, the court had ...
The US Supreme Court should overturn the Facebook’s “Oversight Board’s” “ruling” which upholds the outlawing of the 45th President of the United States from social media.
This is a big tech, corporate oligarchy without standing and it’s gone too far. Enough is enough.
The Supreme Court will hear its last case of the term today at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Here’s a summary of Terry v. United States in a TikTok minute.
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will tackle the legacy of the Reagan-era War on Drugs and Congress' attempt to reduce the punishment disparity between crack-cocaine and powder cocaine offenses.
As @ekownyankah notes, this case has a little bit of everything.
In final case the court will hear this term, profound issues of race, incarceration and the war on drugs - SCOTUSblog
Academics naturally believe that even obscure cases in their field are underappreciated; each minor tax or bankruptcy ...
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket filing in which a church argues that state COVID-related restrictions lack sufficient carveouts for religious worship. This one challenges Colorado's restrictions. It relies heavily on last month's ruling in Tandon v. Newsom.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.