Argument analysis: Justices grapple with preclusion and “occupation” in Crow Tribe treaty case
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard argument in its latest foray into Indian treaty interpretation, Herrera v. Wyoming. The case concerns the persistence of the Crow Tribe’s hunting right in the 1868 Second Treaty of Fort Laramie. In an occasionally meandering argument, the Supreme Court repeatedly circled the three issues at the core of the … Continue reading Argument analysis: Justices grapple with preclusion and “occupation” in Crow Tribe treaty case
Copy and paste this URL into your WordPress site to embed
Copy and paste this code into your site to embed